149
now the spike tends to a point in
R
that maximizes the distance function.
In contrast, for
D
>>
1,
the motion of a one-spike solution is proportional
to the gradient of the regular part of the Neumann Green’s function for the
Laplacian. Finally, for
D
=
0(1),
the motion of
a
spike is proportional to
the gradient of the regular part of the reduced wave Green’s function. This
second Green’s function depends on
D.
For
D
>>
1
and
D
=
0(1),
the equilibrium location of a one-spike
solution is given by the zeroes of the gradient of the regular part of the
Neumann Green’s function and the reduced wave Green’s function, respec-
tively. In this way, we examine how both the shape of the domain and the
inhibitor diffusivity
D
determine the possible equilibrium locations for a
one-spike solution. For
D
small, we find that stable equilibrium spike loca-
tions tend to the centers of the disks of largest radii that can
fit
within the
domain. Hence, for
D
small, there are two stable equilibrium locations for
a dumbbell-shaped domain. In contrast, from the Neumann Green’s func-
tion, we predict that for
a
family of dumbbell-shaped domains there is only
one possible equilibrium location when
D
is sufficiently large. This change
in the multiplicity of an equilibrium spike-layer location is explained from
a
certain bifurcation behavior of the zeroes of the gradient of the regular
part of the reduced wave Green’s function that occurs
at
a
certain critical
value of
D.
The results below have been derived in
[54]
and
[55].
There have been
very few analytical studies of the dynamics of spikes for the GM model (1.1)
or for other reaction-diffusion systems in
R2.
In
[15]
and [lo31 the motion
of
a
one-spike solution for the GM model
(1.1)
was studied for
D
>>
1. In
[34] the metastable motion of a two-spike solution in
R2
was studied in the
weak interaction limit where
D
=
O(E~).
This problem is equivalent to a
one-spike solution in
a
half-space with a Neumann boundary condition. For
this case, the spike interaction is repulsive,
as
was found in [34].
In the results below, there are two Green’s functions that play
a
promi-
nent role. The reduced wave Green’s function
G(z;
zo)
satisfies
1
D
AG
-
-G
=
-d(z
-
ZO)
,
z
E
R;
&G
=
0,
z
E
do.
(4.1)
The regular part
R(z;
20)
of this function is defined by