2.13 Iron 85
(pyrrhotite) and silicate melt and by Shahar et al. (2008) for those between fayalite
and magnetite, demonstrating that Fe isotope fractionations are relatively large at
magmatic temperatures and can be used as a geothermometer. At low temperatures,
Johnson et al. (2002) presented experimental evidence for equilibrium fractionations
between Fe
3+
and Fe
2+
in aqueous solutions. They observed a 2.75‰ enrichment
in Fe
3+
relative to Fe
2+
at 25
◦
C which is about half of that predicted by Schauble
et al. (2001). While it is conceivable that Fe isotope equilibrium can be reached
at high temperatures, indications for equilibrium fractionations are less straightfor-
ward at much lower temperatures. Therefore kinetic fractionations might dominate
Fe isotope fractionations at low temperatures.
Igneous rocks exhibit only small variations in Fe isotope compositions (Zhu
et al. 2002; Beard and Johnson 2004; Poitrasson et al. 2004; Williams et al. 2005;
Weyer et al. 2005). Weyer et al. (2005) found that the Fe isotope composition
in mantle peridotites is slightly lower than in basalts. As suggested by Williams
et al. (2005) the relative incompatibility of ferric iron during melting might incorpo-
rate heavy iron into the melt. During magmatic differentiation the Fe isotope com-
position remains more or less constant except in the very SiO
2
-rich differentiates
(Beard and Johnson 2004; Poitrasson and Freydier 2005). A possible mechanism is
removal of isotopically
56
Fe depleted titanomagnetite (Sch
¨
ußler et al. 2008).
Under low-temperature conditions the observed natural Fe isotope variations of
around 4‰ have been attributed to a large number of processes, which can be
divided into inorganic reactions and into processes initiated by micro-organisms.
Up to 1‰ fractionation can result from precipitation of Fe-containing minerals (ox-
ides, carbonates, sulfides) (Anbar and Rouxel 2007). Larger Fe isotope fraction-
ations occur during biogeochemical redox processes, which include dissimilatory
Fe(III) reduction (Beard et al. 1999; Icopini et al. 2004; Crosby et al. 2007), anaer-
obic photosynthetic Fe(II) oxidation (Croal et al. 2004), abiotic Fe (II) oxidation
(Bullen et al 2001) and sorption of aqueous Fe(II) on Fe(III) hydoxides (Balci
et al. 2006). Controversy still exists whether the iron isotope variations observed
are controlled by kinetic/equilibrium factors or by abiological/microbiological frac-
tionations. This complicates the ability to use iron isotopes to identify microbio-
logical processing in the rock record (Balci et al. 2006). However, as demonstrated
by Johnson et al. (2008) microbiological reduction of Fe
3+
produces much larger
quantities of iron with distinct δ
56
Fe values than abiological processes.
The bulk continental crust has δ
56
Fe values close to zero. Clastic sediments gen-
erally retain the zero ‰ value. Because of its very low concentration in the ocean,
the Fe isotope composition of ocean water so far has not been determined, which
complicates a quantification of the modern Fe isotope cycle. Hydrothermal fluids at
mid-ocean ridges and river waters have δ
56
Fe values between 0 and −1‰ (Fantle
and dePaolo 2004; Bergquist and Boyle 2006; Severmann et al. 2004), whereas
fluids in diagenetic systems show a significantly larger spread with a preferential
depletion in
56
Fe (Severmann et al. 2006). Thus, most iron isotope variations are
produced by diagenetic processes that reflect the interaction between Fe
3+
and Fe
2+
during bacterial iron and sulfate reduction. Processes dominated by sulfide forma-
tion during sulfate reduction produce high δ
56
Fe values for porewaters, whereas the