
306 Handbook of Self Assembled Semiconductor Nanostructures for Novel Devices in Photonics and Electronics
The factor β is polarization; for TM polarization β β
™
n
1
has to be used; TE polarization
leads to β β
TE
n . Due to the spectral dependence of the refractive index n n ( E ), Eq. 9.1
is an implicit equation to determine the discrete resonance energies E E
N
( R
i
) in terms of the
geometric parameter R
i
, Planck’s constant h and vacuum speed of light c . The fi rst factor of the
right side of Eq. 9.1 corresponds to the wavelength in matter. The integer N 1 characterizes
the interference order of the resonance, which is in this case identical to the respective WGM
number [97] . The following term containing β refers to the additional phase shift mentioned
above. Furthermore, since ZnO is uniaxial,
nn
||
( E ) and n n
⬜
( E ) have to be applied for TM and
TE polarization, respectively. We note that Eq. 9.1 for TM polarisation and n const. is identical
to Eq. (17) of [16] . Neglecting the spectral dependency of n , Eq. 9.1 leads to:
E
R
N
∝
1
i
(9.2)
and thus WGMs generally shift to higher energies with decreasing cavity diameter. Note that
although TIR suggests that it is not possible for the light to leave the resonator, emission never-
theless occurs at the corners of the hexagon [97] . After all, radiation losses are always allowed
due to the reasons given in Section 9.3.2.1. Therefore it is possible to optically detect WGMs.
Since the geometrical model leading to Eq. 9.1 is a combination of basic ray and plane wave
optics, it is expected to be valid only for R λ , i.e. for N 1 [97] . However, we show in this
work that Eq. 9.1 describes the experimentally found WGMs even down to mode number N 1 .
9.3.3 Whispering gallery modes in hexagonal ZnO microcrystals
Using the PWM, those peaks in Fig. 9.12 can unambiguously be attributed to WGMs of a hex-
agonal cavity. Therefore it is necessary to determine the correct mode number N of every sin-
gle detected peak. Provided that this mode number is known, Eq. 9.1 enables one to calculate
the theoretical diameter of the crystal D 4 R
i
/ 兹 3 out of every single detected peak energy.
Fortunately, since the peaks have to be numbered in ascending order, one only has to fi nd the
correct mode number to start. The best fi tting and therefore the fi nal peak numbering is found if
every single peak predicts the same radius as all the other resonance peaks, or at least if the vari-
ations in the predicted radius become smallest. This procedure is explained in more detailed in
Fig. 9.14 .
For the investigated crystal, the correct mode numbering is shown also in Fig. 9.3 ; the respec-
tive theoretical diameter yields to D
theory
2.86 μ m with a small minimum–maximum spreading
of less than 10 nm. Although theory predicts both TM and TE polarization, all calculations have
been performed for TM type, since polarization-dependent microphotoluminescence experiments
showed that WGMs are preferentially TM polarized (see Fig. 9.7 ). The required data for
nE
||
()
were
obtained from ellipsometry measurements on PLD-grown ZnO thin fi lm samples [90] .
The experimentally determined cavity diameter obtained from electron microscopy amounts to
D
exp
(2.90 0.06) μ m. Hence, the deviations between theory and experiment are in the range
of only 2%! This means that the simple PWM fi ts very well, even if N is in the range of only 20 to
30. To emphasize this fact, the theoretical values E
N
calculated for fi xed diameter D D
theory
are
given as black arrows in Fig. 9.3 ; they appear very close to the measured peaks. We note that if
a constant value of the index of refraction n without spectral dispersion is used, the agreement
between theory and experiment becomes worse.
9.3.4 Whispering gallery modes in ZnO nanostructures
Although the simple PWM obviously is valid for WGMs with mode numbers in the range of
about N 20–30, i.e. for optical cavities in the micrometre regime, it does not necessarily need
to be valid for nanostructures. Furthermore, prism-shaped microcrystals only enable analysis of
WGMs for fi xed cavity diameter given by the cross-section of the particular microcolumn. Those
restrictions can be vanquished by focusing on nanostructures with a needle-like shape.
CH009-I046325.indd 306CH009-I046325.indd 306 6/24/2008 3:05:18 PM6/24/2008 3:05:18 PM