mass and size on the response of accelerometers attached to the skin overlying soft
tissue. The lack of rigidity of the human body as a supporting structure makes meas-
urements of acceleration usually preferable to those of velocity or displacement.The
mechanical impedance of a sitting, standing, or supine subject is extremely useful for
calculating the vibratory energy transmitted to the body by the vibrating structure.
The mechanical impedance of small areas of the body surface can be measured in
different ways (see Chap. 12), for example by vibrating pistons, resonating rods, and
acoustical impedance tubes.
If the entire body is exposed to a pressure or blast wave in air or water, exact def-
inition of the pressure environment is essential. The pressure distribution should be
measured if possible. If the environment deviates from free-field conditions, it
should be carefully specified because of its effect on peak pressure and pressure vs.
time-history.
SIMULATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS
The establishment of limits of human tolerance to mechanical forces, and the explana-
tion of injuries produced when these limits are exceeded, frequently requires experi-
mentation at various degrees of potential hazard. To avoid unnecessary risks to
humans, animals are used first for detailed physiological studies. As a result of these
studies, levels may be determined which are, with reasonable probability, safe for
human subjects. However, such comparative experiments have obvious limitations.
The different structure, size, and weight of most animals shift their response curves to
mechanical forces into other frequency ranges and to other levels than those observed
on humans. These differences must be considered in addition to the general and par-
tially known physiological differences between species. For example, the natural fre-
quency of the thorax-abdomen system of a human subject is between 3 and 4 Hz; for a
mouse the same resonance occurs between 18 and 25 Hz. Therefore maximum effect
and maximum damage occur at different vibration frequencies and different shock-
time patterns in a mouse than in a human. However, studies on small animals are well
worth making if care is taken in the interpretation of the data and if scaling laws are
established. Dogs, pigs, and primates are used extensively in such tests.
Many kinematic processes, physical loadings, and gross destructive anatomical
effects can be studied on dummies which approximate a human being in size, form,
mobility, total weight, and weight distribution in body segments. In contrast to those
used only for load purposes, dummies simulating basic static and dynamic properties
of the human body are called anthropometric or anthropomorphic dummies. Several
such dummies have been designed for specific simulations.
5
For automobile frontal
collisions, the Hybrid III dummy shown in Fig. 42.2 has become the de facto stan-
dard, and is used in North America and Europe to simulate occupants in crash tests
and tests of safety restraint systems. The original dummy was constructed to corre-
spond to a 50th-percentile North American male. It possesses a metal “skeleton”
covered with a vinyl skin and foam to produce the appropriate external shape, with
a rubber lumbar spine curved to mimic a sitting posture, and a shoulder structure
capable of supporting safety belt loads.The head, neck, chest, and knee responses of
the Hybrid III are designed to mimic human responses, namely, the head accelera-
tion resulting from forehead and side-of-the-head impacts, the fore-and-aft and lat-
eral bending of the neck, the deflection of the chest to distributed forces on the
sternum, and impacts on the knee.
4
The instrumentation required to record these
responses together with local axial compressional loads is described in Fig. 42.2 and
42.4 CHAPTER FORTY-TWO
8434_Harris_42_b.qxd 09/20/2001 12:21 PM Page 42.4