
SECTION 2.2. MAGNETIC IMPURITIES 47
The self-energy matrix here is:
as follows from Eqs. (2.34), (2.35), and (2.8).
2.1.5. Anderson's Theorem
The solution of Eqs. (2.36) and (2.37) may be found in the same manner as
was done for the normal state. It gives the same formal result: the appearance
of exponential factors in the Green’s functions. However, the gap in the
energy spectrum of the superconductor is subject to the self-consistency equa-
tion (1.144), which includes the superconducting propagator at So
evidently nonmagnetic impurities do not influence the thermodynamics of a
superconductor.
2.1.6. "Londonization" by Elastic Scattering
Another important consequence follows from the comparison of Eqs. (1.169)
and (2.26). At / the electron correlation radius in superconductors becomes
less than . We have mentioned this circumstance in Chap. 1 as the “Londoniza-
tion” of superconductors by the scattering of elastic impurities. This aspect of the
influence of impurities is important for superconductors, making their electrody-
namics local.
2.2.
MAGNETIC IMPURITIES
When the paramagnetic part of the potential (r) (2.2) is “switched on,” the
interaction becomes explicitly dependent on the electrons’ spins. Consequently, the
spin variables should be preserved in the intermediate calculations of Sect. 2.1.
Using the Hamiltonian
*In the theory of superconductivity, this result is sometimes called the Anderson theorem.
11