mixed company, helped to focus attention on the mus-
cular torso as an attribute of masculinity. Bodybuilding
as a defined set of techniques soon followed. For exam-
ple, Charles Atlas, who billed himself as “the world’s most
perfectly developed man,” began in 1929 to market his
system for turning “97-pound weaklings” into muscular
giants. The first “Mr. America” contest was held a decade
later, won by the bodybuilding legend Bert Goodrich.
The invention of weight-training machines, such as
the Nautilus in the late 1960s and early 1970s, trans-
formed the nature of physical exercise and made strength
training readily available to men of all ages and ability
levels. By the mid-1970s, men and women alike were
putting in more and more time at the gym in pursuit of
the ideal body. Meanwhile, bodybuilding as a sport was
popularized by specialized magazines, by famous gather-
ing spots like southern California’s “Muscle Beach,” and
by a network of professional and amateur contests.
Bodybuilding is a special subculture, in which ex-
tremely massive musculature, the hypertrophic develop-
ment of all of the body’s muscles (often relying in part
on steroids and other metabolic enhancements), and the
taking of sculptural poses tend to go far beyond main-
stream society’s criteria for the masculine ideal. In some
gay subcultures, bodybuilding to a lesser extreme is the
norm, and having a “cut” body (one with sharply defined
musculature) is highly sought after. Within those com-
munities, implants, liposuction, and other surgical en-
hancements have become commonplace. Most broadly,
a toned, muscular body has become a widely accepted
ideal for young men in Western cultures, to the extent
that not to possess such a body is as much cause for self-
conscious concern as it has become for a woman not to
be toned, shapely, and firm.
As these body ideals are considered, new functions
and new perspectives of the fashioned body unfold. The
body’s role as a site of resistance, empowerment, and
emancipation reveals that the body ideals of fashion are
not necessarily satisfied by the pursuit of beauty alone.
See also Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arnold, Rebecca. Fashion, Desire and Anxiety, London: IB Tau-
ris, 2001.
Balsamo, Annen. Technologies of the Gendered Body. Durham,
N.C.: Duke University Press, 1977.
Bordo, Susan. “The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity: A
Feminist Approach to Foucault.” In Gender/Body/Knowledge.
Edited by A. Jaggar and S. Bordo. New Brunswick, N.J.:
Rutgers University Press, 1989.
Frueh, Joanna, et al., eds. Picturing the Modern Amazon. New
York: New Museum Books; Rizzoli International, 1999.
Gaines, Charles. Pumping Iron: The Art and Sport of Bodybuild-
ing. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982.
Ince, Kate. Orlan: Millennial Female (Dress, Body, Culture). Ox-
ford: Berg, 2000.
Nettleton, Sarah, and Jonathan Watson. The Body in Everyday
Life. London: Routledge, 1998.
Quinn, Bradley. Techno Fashion. Oxford: 2002.
Steele, Valerie. The Corset. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University
Press, 2001.
Webster, David Pirie. Bodybuilding: An Illustrated History. New
York: Arco Publishing, 1982.
Bradley Quinn
BODY PIERCING Body piercing is the practice of
inserting jewelry (usually metal, though wood, glass,
bone, or ivory, and certain plastics are used as well) com-
pletely through a hole in the body. Piercing is often com-
bined with other forms of body art, such as tattooing or
branding, and many studios offer more than one of these
services. While virtually any part of the body can be, and
has been, pierced and bejeweled (for evidence, see the
well-known Web site http://www.bmezine.com) widely
pierced sites include ear, eyebrow, nose, lip, tongue, nip-
ple, navel, and genitals.
Much of what popularly passes for the history of
body piercing is in fact fictitious. In the 1970s, the Los
Angeles resident Doug Malloy, an eccentric and wealthy
proponent of piercing, set forth with charismatic au-
thority a set of historical references connecting contem-
porary Western body piercing to numerous ancient
practices. He declared, for example, that ancient Egypt-
ian royalty pierced their navels (consequently valuing
deep navels), Roman soldiers hung their capes from rings
through their nipples, the hafada (a piercing through the
skin of the scrotum) was a puberty rite brought back from
the Middle East by French legionnaires, and that the
guiche (a male piercing of the perineum) was a Tahitian
puberty rite performed by respected transvestite priests.
No anthropological accounts bear out these claims.
What facts can be sorted from the fiction nonethe-
less attest to the remarkable antiquity of piercing. The
oldest fully preserved human being found, the 5,300-
year-old “ice-man” of the Alps, shows evidence of ear-
lobe piercing. Like many with a serious interest in
piercing in the twenty-first century, the ice-man has
stretched his lobes, in his case to a diameter of about
seven millimeters. Artifacts as well as bodies offer evi-
dence of ancient single and multiple ear piercings from
as early as the ninth century
B
.
C
.
E
.
While Malloy’s claims are largely imaginative, there
are geographically diverse cultures in which piercing has
been continually practiced for quite some time. Ear and
nose piercing seem to be, and seem to have been, the
most popular; indeed, there are far too many examples
to list here, and the following instances should be taken
as representative rather than anything close to exhaus-
tive. Many Native American peoples practiced ear or
nose—generally septum—piercing (the latter most fa-
BODY PIERCING
166
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CLOTHING AND FASHION
69134-ECF-B_107-210.qxd 8/16/2004 1:49 PM Page 166