area recognized Se as a pathfinder for U in the roll-front deposits that received much
exploration attention at that time. Determinations were made of the U content of
many plant species that grow in the arid to semi-arid environments of the mid-west
and southern United States. It was found that the poison (or milk) vetch (Astragalus
spp.) and juniper (Juniperus monosperma) were able to accumulate more U than most
other species, although a single sample of greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatis)
returned a phenomenally high 7400 ppm U in ash (Cannon, 1952). In subsequent
studies, the uranium content of many more species was determined (Cannon, 1964).
A full review of this and other work worldwide up to the mid-1980s was published as
a Nuclear Energy Agency/International Atomic Energy Commission (NEA/IAEA)
‘state-of-the-art’ report with a co mprehensive list and brief summary of 128 papers
detailing U biogeochemistry in mineral exploration (Dunn et al., 1985).
Uranium concentrations in plant ash are commonly less than 1 ppm (o0.02 ppm
U in dry tissue), but the high mobility of U in the natural environment has resulted
in some remarkably high levels that may extend over large areas. In northern
Saskatchewan, near the eastern edge of the Precambrian (Helikian) sandstones
comprising the Athabasca Group, there are some of the world’s largest and richest U
deposits. Biogeochemical investigations in that area have shown that the most recent
ten years growth of twigs from black spruce (Picea mariana) are enriched in U, and
they provide a simple, practical and effective medium for outlining local and regional
zones of U enrichment (Dunn 1981, 1983b,c). Details of this study are given as a case
history in Chapter 11.
Over zones of U mineralization there is considerable heterogeneity of U in and
among plant species. Whereas some studies report that roots contain more U than
other tissues, other investigations have found more U in bark (Kovalevsky, 1973)or
twigs (Dunn, 1981). Either bark or twigs can be effective, but roots are impractical to
collect and it is difficult to remove inorganic particulates.
In the Athabasca area tissues from common plants were analysed to establish a
hierarchy of their relative ability to accumulate U. Table 9-VIII shows that there are
two orders of magnitude difference between concentrations of U in black spruce
twigs and concentrations in conifer trunk wood, in horsetails and in water lilies.
Near U mineralization, the ratio of U in twigs to that in needles of black spruce
is 10:1, whereas in areas remote from mineralization this ratio is usually 2:1.
Plants from the Eden Project give further information on the relative uptake of U
by different species. Concentrations in dry foliage range from below the detection
limit of 0.01 ppm U to almost 1 ppm U in Arar (Tetraclinis articulata).
Bouda (1986) sampled heather, gorse, fern, grass, ash and several conifers grow-
ing on the Dartmoor granite, and found highest concentrations in heather (Erica
tetralix) and gorse (Ulex spp.) with 0.14 and 0.13 ppm U, respectively. About 80% of
the U in the Dartmoor granite of southwest England occurs as uraninite.
Concentrations similar to those in the samples from Dartmoor represent maximum
concentrations encountered in tree ferns from the western Amazon and in conifer bark
and twigs from western Canada in areas with no known U mineralization, but where
318
Biogeochemical Behaviour of the Elements