the essential nutrients for maintaining the health of certain species – e.g., elevated
levels of K and Mg for banana plants (Musa spp.). Although there are these local
modifications, soils throughout the HTB and WTB are generally similar in overall
elemental composition, although the HTB soils contain double the amount of or-
ganic matter of that in the WTB (60% compared to 30%). There are some differences
between the soils of the two biomes, but the only element that is much more highly
concentrated in one biome (the HTB) is Ag. Table 8-I presents average concentra-
tions of 53 elements obtained from analysis of the 80 mesh (ASTM) fraction of
soils collected from six widely spaced sites in each biome. To put these data in
context, they are compared with 104 soils from a natural environm ent in central
British Col umbia – Mount Polley, where Cu–Au porphyry mineralization occurs. All
soils were prepared in the same manner by sieving, and were then analyzed at the
same laboratory by digesting in aqua regia with an ICP-MS finish.
FOLIAGE COLLECTION FROM THE BIOMES
In order to assess the relative uptake of elements by various species contained
within each Eden Project biome, as a first step, representative samples of leaf tissues
were collected from a selection of the more common plants. Within a four-hour
period, a few leaves from each of 25 species from the WTB and each of 46 species
from the HTB were collected, generating a total of 71 samples. These were oven-
dried, hermetically sealed, and sent to Canada for milling prior to analysis. One-gram
portions of each powdered sample were digested in nitric acid, then aqua regia, with
an ICP-MS finish for 51 elements. Tables 8-II and 8-III list the species by biome and
geographic area, and provide botanical and common names as well as some noted
features.
There are many ways to view the data obtained, hence the complete analysis of
each sample is provided on the CD inside the back cover of this book. One per-
spective is to sort the data with respect to the maximum concentrations of each
element and the relative concentration with respect to the mean of the dataset
(‘anomaly contrast ratio’). Results of this exercise are shown in Table 8-IV. From
this table it can be seen that the species concentrating germanium to the greatest
degree is bamboo, with a concentration factor (maximum divided by the mean) of
43.6. The ‘star cluster’ (Pentas) has strong relative enrichment of several elements –
Co (x40), W (x25), Al (x6.5), Th (x6). Fig (Ficus) is enriched with REE (La x34 and
Ce x26) and Tl (x14.7). Gold enrichment is the greatest in kapok bush (Eriocephalus).
Noted above is the fact that Ag is significantly more enriched in soils of the HTB
(average of 16,954 ppb Ag from 6 samples) compared to those in the WTB (average
of 162 ppb Ag from 6 samples) It might be expected, therefore, that plants in the
HTB would have appreciably higher Ag concentrations than those in the WTB and,
in fact, the majority of plants containing the highest levels of Ag occur in the HTB.
However, this pattern is not universal. For example, Acacia nigrescens (HTB) yielded
215
Biogeochemistry in Mineral Exploration