and readily comparable with their work in the two volumes of the Dover Bible (Cambridge
Corpus Christi College MSS 3+4). The older artist, working on the second volume,
represents a local pictorial tradition which delighted in stylisation – spectacled eye-
shadows, nested folds to drapery, elaborately and very accurately drawn key-patterns
(Figure 9). His colleague acted as a conductor to the new byzantine naturalism in the first
volume, and the pair of them (Figure 10) are pictured at work on f.241v of MS4, one of
them perhaps the painter Alberius who held Canterbury land from 1153–67. Together
they made drawing and painting in the crypt on an extensive scale; and as at Winchester
the latter is always confident and rarely corrected.
13
It is from Canterbury that comes one of the very few purely practical drawings of the
period, ca. 1160, a plan of the monastic buildings recording the water supply and
drainage system, depicting pure water brought in from local springs to irrigate wheat,
vines, and orchards as well to sweeten the fishpond and to provide drinking water; and
water collected from the roofs for the lavatories and to flush the drains.
The English proto-Renaissance, which encompassed the naturalism of the Winchester
School and the work at Canterbury, Durham, and other centres, lasted little beyond 1200.
Gothic architecture did away with the large blank walls so suited to narrative schemes,
replacing them with stained-glass windows. In these the leaded lines dictated a highly
decorative approach, one in which courtly elegance was to edge out realism and gravitas,
and in turn drawing itself fell prey to the same fashionable taste.
1
For the evolution of the initial see C. Nordenfalk. Celtic and Anglo-Saxon Painting in the
British Isles 600-800. New York: Chatto & Windus, 1976.
2
Giraldus Cambriensis, quoted in J.J.G. Alexander. Insular Manuscripts from the 6th to
the 9th Century. London: Harvey Miller, 1978, p. 73. For an exhaustive account of the Book of
Kells, see F. Henry. The Book of Kells. London: Thames and Hudson, 1974.
3
For an analysis of the styles in question, see F. Wormald, English Drawing of the 10th & 11th
Centuries. London: 1952.
4
E. Temple, Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts. London: Harvey Miller, 1976, p. 82.
5
F. Wormald, and M. Biddle, Antiquaries Journal XLVII, 1976, pp. 159, 162, 277.
6
Recorded in the Winton Book Record Commission Domesday Book IV
addimenta 531-62; and M. Biddle, O. Von Feilitzer, and D. Keane,
Winchester in the Early Middle Ages. Oxford: 1976, p. 72 et al.
7
C.M. Kauffmann, Romanesque Manuscripts. London: Harvey Miller, 1975, p.
-----102.
KEVIN FLYNN
54
Drawing the Process book 15/2/05 10:31 am Page 54