Malmesbury has been predominantly used in this work, though Gerald of
Wales and Reginald of Durham are two of many other chroniclers who
could have been cited.) The chroniclers were, however, a small group of
men, whereas the archaeologically excavated bodies run into thousands
of men, women and children. By the end of the Middle Ages the ratio is
reversed. By the mid-thirteenth century the distinctive archaeological
practices of charcoal burials and pillow stones had been abandoned, and
burials were almost entirely uniform in appearance. Skeletons still give
important evidence about disease, but reveal less about funerals, burial
practices and beliefs. Whereas archaeology decreases in importance,
historical documents detailing funerals rapidly increase. Surviving wills
are the most numerous historical source for individual beliefs and
practices concerning death and burial. Tens of thousands of wills survive
from the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, which give the viewpoint and
beliefs of individual people or communities. For the first time a large-
scale view of individual piety and beliefs can be analysed. For 500 years
we have a combination of excellent historical, archaeological and literary
evidence for the religious views of the time. This combination allows
theories to be tested in a way undreamt of for earlier periods.
Three themes have not been explored in detail. First is the continental
development of death and burial practices. There is excellent material
from individual countries, especially France and Italy (Ariès 1974, 1987;
Volvelle 1976, 1983; Banker 1988; Strocchia 1992), but examples show
that local customs could be very different to English practice: cadaver
tombs, very popular in the rest of Europe, were rare in England.
Similarly, charcoal burials were an essentially English method of burial.
The second theme is anthropology. Third is monumental brass and tomb
development. These have been excellently researched and written up
(Coales 1987; Colvin 1991; Binski 1996), and any assessment would
have expanded the book beyond its means.
Finally, it is my great pleasure to express my gratitude to all those
people who have helped in the making of this book. Thanks are due to
Richard Briggs, Jef Maytom and Dominic Tweddle for their patience
while work was in progress, and to the numerous readers of chapters:
Don Brothwell, Clive Burgess, David Crouch, David J.F.Crouch,
Vanessa Harding, Charles Kightly, Terry and Sonia O’Connor, Philip
Rahtz, Ann Rycraft, Danae Tankard, Victoria Thompson and Lorna
Watts. I am especially indebted to my father, David Daniell, who
lovingly read and commented in detail on every chapter, and to Dorothy
and Andy, my mother and brother, and Marilyn Campbell for all their
constant help and support.
viii
Chris Daniell
York Archaeological Trust