
INTRODUCTION TO CAPITAL BUDGETING 5-17
v.05/13/94 v-1.1
p.01/14/00
Likewise, an investor with a required rate of return at r
1
will invest
in the project, because the IRR of the project is greater than the
required return. However, an investor with a required rate of return
at r
2
will not invest in the project because the IRR is less than the
hurdle rate.
An investment may have a different NPV curve for each company
doing the analysis, depending on each company's discount rate. This
means that a project may be acceptable for one company, but
unacceptable for another with a higher cost of funds.
Problems with
using IRR for
investment
decisions
Usually, the NPV and the IRR calculations produce the same accept/
reject decisions about investments. However, IRR does have some
problems if the required rate of return (or cost of funds) varies from
year to year. This situation requires a complicated weighted average
IRR. Also, if the cash flows for the project change from positive to
negative (meaning that additional investments are needed later in the
project) or vice-versa, the IRR becomes complicated to use. It is
conceivable that the NPV curve could cross the horizontal axis more
than once producing more than one internal rate of return. For these
reasons, net present value is considered superior to internal rate of
return for making investment decisions.
ADJUSTING NPV AND IRR FOR INFLATION
Cash flows may
change with
inflation
Calculating the net present value and internal rate of return for a
potential investment may require an adjustment for inflation. Actual
cash inflows and outflows may change considerably as inflation
changes. The variation may be large enough to change an invest/ don't
invest decision, especially if the inflation rate is high. Earlier, we
introduced a formula to convert a real, risk-free interest rate to a
nominal interest rate, based on a specific rate of inflation.
R
N
= R
R
+ h + ( h x R
R
)