281
ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS
PREPARING FOR THE EXAMINATION
Technology-supported market research could help provide in-depth analysis of a
single market so enabling informed decisions to be made aimed at improving
demand. Technology-supported market research might form a sub-system feed-
ing a more comprehensive marketing database and Management Information
System (MIS). MIS might include comparative competitor approaches to stim-
ulating demand.
Vehicle dashboards displays. Cars could be fi tted with microchips that indicate when
a vehicle is in need of a service (e.g. after 20,000 miles). Alternative examples
include a display of dealer contact details when a vehicle is in need of replace-
ment (e.g. after 3 years) and so on.
B3(a) Options to overcome the software not fi tting the existing business process exactly.
Change will be required as a result of the mismatch between the software and the
existing business process. There appear to be two distinct options:
Option 1, Change the software or
Option 2, Change the business process.
The choice should be made taking account of all relevant costs and benefi ts and
might be made using suitable evaluation criteria such as suitability, acceptability
and feasibility (or similar).
The applications software is designed to perform specifi c fi nancial functions of
the business. It is essentially an ‘off the shelf rather than a bespoke solution but
could conceivably be adapted. Such an adaptation could be fi nancially costly. There
is also a need to identify the necessary expertise to carry out this software develop-
ment and the company may need to employ outside source for the purpose.
Changing the business process represents yet another change initiative that staff
may respond to negatively. As competitors and peers are using the software already
it is reasonable to assume that it will encapsulate industry best practice. These
organisations apparently operate in that way that is consistent with the software.
This implies that S&C may operate in an inconsistent and possibly ineffi cient
fashion.
B3(b) A phased approach: more suitable than a ‘big bang’ approach.
The more direct ‘big bang’ approach generally represents the highest risk, as at a
predetermined point in time the old system ceases to operate completely. Using
this approach there is no opportunity to validate the new system’s output with the
old, so management must have complete confi dence in the new system. As the
software in question appears to be something of an industry standard there is likely
to be some general confi dence in it. However, there appears to be something of a
mismatch between the system and corresponding processes, which could prove a
diffi culty.
The phased approach involves gradual implementation possibly involving one
subsystem at a time. This might involve implementing the system by fi rst convert-
ing the customer accounts subsystem, then the reporting sub-system, and so on.
This offers distinct advantages in this particular case:
●
Staff are likely to be suffering ‘change fatigue’ from previous initiatives and can
only endure so much upheaval while continuing to function effectively.
●
The continued support of the partners as project sponsors is important and they
are likely to see ‘deliverables’ sooner with a phased roll-out.