GUIDED TOUR XIII
plished through cultural change measures or if this calls for structural elements such as
changes in the ratio of men/women in particular senior positions. Greater representation
by women would then lead to cultural change (Kanter, 1977; Ely, 1995). Another pos-
ition assumes that the use of structural measures – setting targets and controlling to
make sure that these are attained – to recruit or promote greater numbers of females in
order to fill the quota does not imply a qualitative change and may backfire as those
recruited/promoted will be evaluated negatively (Alvesson, 2002).
Study Questions
1. What are the main differences between the emic and etic approach to organiz-
ational culture? Under what circumstances would you use either approach?
2. How would you go about analysing the effects of the societal environment on
organizational culture?
3. Explain whether it always makes sense to distinguish between thedifferent levels
(societal, industrial, individual) at which organizational culture can be analysed?
4. Explain the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational
culture.
5. Discuss the relationship between organizational culture and strategy.
6. Discuss whether, how and when organizational culture affects organizational
performance?
7. Explain whether organizational culture can always be changed readily. Discuss
whether there are aspects of organizational culture that are more easily
changed than others and, if so, whether this change can be called real change.
8. How can industry features limit organizational culture change, and how can a
change in the industrial environment enforce organizational culture change?
9. What are the mechanisms that help organizations to perpetuate and reproduce
some of the widely shared assumptions within the organization?
10. Explain whether cultural fit is always essential for successful mergers and
acquisitions.
Further Reading
Alvesson, M. (2002) Understanding Organizational Culture. London: Sage.
Critical book on organizational culture research. Deals with a wide range of topics
that have been touched upon in this chapter.
Cartwright, S. and Cooper, C.L. (1993) The role of culture compatibility in successful
organizational marriage. Academy of Management Executive 2, 57–70.
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE RESEARCH 133
societal or industry-level changes are so strong that individual organizations must
respond to these. There is then an institutional pressure to adapt to new ideas – an
inability or unwillingness to do so leading to legitimacy problems (DiMaggio and Powell,
1983; Scott, 1995).
The third view on cultural change – everyday reframing – is the more relevant mode of
cultural change for the large majority of managers, not being at the top of large organiz-
ations. Everyday reframing is mainly an informal culture-shaping agenda, involving
pedagogical leadership, in which an actor exercises a subtle influence through the rene-
gotiation of meaning. It is strongly anchored in interactions and communication, and is
also better adapted to the material work situations of people, thus having strong action
implications. It is, typically, mainly incremental and is a matter of local cultural change.
These three types of change are not contradictory but may go hand in hand. New
ideas and values in society may ‘soften up’ an organization for change (i.e. the Green
movement); top management may experience a combination of legitimacy problems,
together with convictions that there are good ‘internal’ reasons for change, and therefore
take the initiative to change. Some managers, without getting specific instructions to do
something special, but encouraged by societal changes and new signals from top manage-
ment, may take initiatives to reframe local thinking on the issue concerned. Within a
specific domain, division, department or work group, the reshaping of ideas, values and
meaning may be more drastic than in other parts of the organization, without necessary
deviating from these in the direction of the change (Alvesson, 2002: 181).
Cultural change versus structural and material change
Aside from the type of cultural change, there is also the question of whether cultural
change also involves matters such as structural and material arrangements, directly
implying behavioural changes. Broadly speaking, there are two schools of thought on this
issue. Most authors on organizational culture emphasize the level of assumptions
(values), ideas and beliefs in order to make any ‘real’ change possible. Occasionally,
writers stress the more material side of organizations. This approach suggests that
making people behave differently is what matters; cultural changes will follow.
Reallocation of resources and rewarding different behaviour would then be sufficient.
One could plausiblyargue, however, that the relevantlevel and/or aspects of change are
matters of the problems or questionsconcer ned.For example, if it is amatter of core business
with direct links to production, performances and performance measures, then cultural
change appears unrealistic (Alvesson, 2002: 182).If we talk about something less material,
like greater openness or new ways of interacting with customer s, then cultural elements
become involved. Often, however, the interplay between thelevel of meaning and the level of
behaviour, material and structural ar rangements must be considered in organizational
change. There are sufficient examples of these dilemmas in the literature. There are, for
instance, various opinions on whether a change towards knowledge sharing calls for struc-
tural measures,such as performanceincentives andevaluations (as arguedby,say, Davenport
and Prusak, 1998), or whether ‘true’ knowledge sharing presupposes value commitments
(O’Dell and Grayson, 1998),which may be counteracted by formal control and rewards.
Regarding gender issues, of which the above case study on RaboBank is an example,
there is debate as to whether increased gender equality in organizations can be accom-
132 COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT
Study Questions
These encourage you to review
and apply the knowledge you
have acquired from each chapter
and can be used to test your
understanding.
Further Reading
Each chapter ends with a section
of guided further reading,
providing details of importance
sources and useful articles and
texts for further research and
study.
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE RESEARCH 143142 COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT
concentrate on innovative activities but, as a result of cost-cutting measures, is
now unable to continue to do so. It is clear, however, that rather like the results
of the survey at AO DTS, survey results at KPN WD paint a different picture from
the results that stem from qualitative research sources. Presumably this con-
tradiction is due to the fact that surveys can induce people to answer in an
‘appropriate’ way and/or that the itemsof each dimension, though validated, are
not always interpreted correctly.
The sixth dimension is stability. Characteristic of organizations scoring
high on this dimension is being rule-orientated, emphasizing stability, pre-
dictability, and security of employment; employees are constrained by many
rules. From the survey results it is clear that AO DTS employees do not see
stability as a feature of the organization. In contrast, KPN WD employees
responded positively and hence see KPN WD as an organization that empha-
sizes stability and predictability. In this case, interviews support the survey
results.
The last dimension, team orientation, refers to the extent to which people are
encouraged to cooperate and coordinate within and across units. The survey
results show that AO DTS employees do not see team-orientatedness as a feature
of the organization. Two out of three employees responded negatively. In fact,
qualitative research shows that employees experience the lack of cooperation
within AO DTS as a major weakness. KPN WD employees, on the other hand,
responded positively and emphasized that team orientation is definitely a feature
of the organization.
Main organizational culture differences
Quantitative research, combined with qualitative results, shows the following
organizational culture differences between Atos DTS and KPN WD.
1. Both, AO DTS and KPN WD are results-orientated with respect to the quality
achieved but only AO DTS is results-orientated in financial terms.
2. AO DTS is less employee-orientated than KPN WD.
3. AO DTS is less open (to criticism) than KPN WD.
4. AO DTS is less ethical than KPN WD.
5. Neither organization is truly innovative, but KPN WD is characterized by
structures that could help to improve ‘innovativeness’ if wanted.
6. AO DTS is less rule-orientated, and emphazises less stability and pre-
dictability than KPN WD.
7. AO DTS is less team-orientated than KPN WD.
Questions
1. Explain the concept of organizational culture.
2. Discuss how organizational culture can be measured, and how this has been
approached in the case study. What would be the best way to measure
culture, given that there are shortcomings to the etic and emic approaches>
3. Explain whether the examination of culture in the case study should also
include national culture analysis to provide the companies with valid results?
4. Discuss the factors that can aid understanding of the differences in organiz-
ational culture between AO DTS and KPN WD.
5. Explain whether the organizational culture differences between AO DTS and
KPN WD are such that they should be taken into account during the inte-
gration process of the two subdivisions?
6. Explain the types of measure you think the management of the merged sub-
divisions should take in order to ensure the successful integration of the two
organizations?
7. Explain to what extent institutions (e.g. the stock market) have an influence
on organizational culture. Can you give any other examples of this type?
References
Abrahamson, E. and Fombrun, C.J. (1994) Macrocultures: determinants and conse-
quences. Academy of Management Review 19(4), 728–55.
Adler, N. (1996) International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. Cincinnati, OH:
South-Western College Publishing.
Adler, N. and Jelinek, M. (1986) Is ‘organization culture’ culture bound? Human
Resource Management 25, 73–90.
Allen, R.F. (1985) Four phases for bringing about cultural change, in Kilmann, R.H.,
Saxton, M.J., Serpa, R. et al. (eds) Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 137–47.
Alvesson, M. (2002) Understanding Organizational Culture. London: Sage.
Berg, P.O. (1986) Symbolic management of human resources. Human Resource
Management 25, 557–79.
Berry, J.W. (1980) Social and cultural change, in Triandis, H.C. and Brislin, R.W. (eds)
Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 211–79.
Berry, J.W. (1983) Acculturation: a comparative analysis of alternative forms, in
Samuda, R.J. and Woods, S.L. (eds) Perspectives in Immigrant and Minority
Education. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 66–77.
Bhagat, R.S. and McQuaid, S.J. (1982) Role of subjective culture in organizations: a
reviewanddirectionsforfutureresearch. Journalof Applied Psychology67(5), 653–85.
Cases
Chapters end with relevant and
up-to-date case studies featuring
real organizations, offering
examples of management from a
variety of different cultures. Case
study questions encourage
students to analyse each case
and the management issues it
raises.
References
Each chapter ends with a full
listing of the books and other
sources referred to in the
chapter, providing the student
with an opportunity to undertake
further study.
MG9353 pre.qxp 10/3/05 8:56 am Page xiii