and “Poor Liza” (1792), a short novel about a peas-
ant girl. Several other stories that Karamzin wrote
at this time brought French sentimentalism to
Russia and were widely imitated.
Karamzin was not particularly interested in
politics, but when he established a new journal in
1801, Vestnik Evropy (The Messenger of Europe), it
became the leading political journal in Russia. It
was the most widely read publication in Russia
during the early 1800s. The journal’s popularity
brought financial success, which freed Karamzin to
begin his enormous historiographic work, History
of the Russian State (1819–29). This 12-volume
work, which covered Russian history up to 1613,
was the most complete history of Russia of the
time. The Russian emperor, Aleksandr I, appointed
Karamzin official historiographer in 1803 with a
pension of 2,000 rubles a year, a considerable sum.
Between 1810 and 1811, Karamzin worked on
Memoir on Ancient and Modern Russia (1811). In
this work, Karamzin related his political beliefs, as
well as his personal conversations with Aleksandr
I. He believed that autocracy was the appropriate
form of government for Russia, making a careful
distinction between autocracy and despotism,
based on the importance of the law.
Karamzin left a long-lasting legacy when he
died in 1826. He had become one of the closest
friends of the emperor and remained a defender
of the monarchy. More important, Karamzin’s
work influenced such important writers as Alek-
sandr
PUSHKIN and Mikhail LERMONTOV. He also es-
tablished a historiographic tradition that did not
previously exist in Russia, and his account of Russ-
ian history was an important part of the Russian
self-image into the 20th century.
Works about Nikolai Karamzin
Black, Joseph Lawrence. Nicholas Karamzin and Russ-
ian Society in the Nineteenth Century: A Study in
Russian Political and Historical Thought. To r o n t o :
University of Toronto Press, 1976.
Hammarberg, Gitta. From the Idyll to the Novel:
Karamzin’s Sentimentalist Prose. New York: Cam-
bridge University Press, 1991.
Lewis, S. Mark. Modes of Historical Discourse in J. G.
Herder and N. M. Karamzin. New York: Peter
Lange, 1995.
Karnad, Girish (1938– ) playwright
Girish Ranghunath Karnad was born in Maha-
rashtra, India, but has lived most of his life in the
southern state of Karnataka. Most of Karnad’s
work is written in Kannada, the language spoken
in Karnataka, but he has translated all his major
plays into English. He is a playwright, story writer,
poet, and director of films.
After completing his college studies in math
and statistics in 1958 at Karnataka University, Kar-
nad went to Oxford University to earn a master’s
degree in philosophy, politics, and economics. It is
here that Karnad first started to explore his artistic
talents and began writing poetry.
When Karnad returned to India, he started to
work at Oxford University Press in 1963. After the
success of his second play Tughlaq (1964), he de-
cided to quit the press and has since devoted his
life to writing drama. At one point (1974–75), he
was the director of the Film Institute of Pune,
India.
Karnad has written 10 plays, all of which are ex-
tremely politically driven but read like folktales.
His very first play Yaya ti (1961), written while
studying at Oxford, is taken from a story in the
great Hindu epic The Mahabharata. It recounts the
events that follow a son’s attempt to rescue his fa-
ther from a curse, thus throwing the entire family
into a moral dilemma. There is a strong sense of
the past in Karnad’s work, and he borrows exten-
sively from Indian mythology and history. His play
Tughlaq, for instance, shows the transformation of
the old Mughal emperor (Mohammad bin Tugh-
laq) from a sensitive ruler into an unjust oppressor.
His folktale Cheluvi (1992), which was also made
into a movie, is about a girl who turns into a tree,
thus becoming a symbolic vehicle of nature’s out-
cry against humanity’s inconsiderate actions.
Karnad’s plays have always carried social mes-
sages. At a time when most of his peers were
Karnad, Girish 235