Preface
The title of a book should ideally tell the
reader something about its contents. The
title - Secrets of Opening Surprises -
clearly suggests, and indeed promises, a
few things. There can be no doubt that this
book proclaims to be about openings. The
addition of the word 'surprises' may sug-
gest to the reader that he
wilt
find out so-
mething new, or unexpected. Finally, the
author, in
chosing
this title, purports to re-
veal certain 'secrets'.
What is an opening surprise? Or indeed
what sort of move in the opening phase of
a chess game do we consider to be surpri-
sing? The general rules of opening play
state quite clearly that you should: (I)
gain influence in the centre.
(2)
develop
your pieces, and
(3)
bring your king into
safety. Therefore, you should not: make
to many pawn moves, move more than
once with the same piece, develop your
queen too early, etc, etc.
It
follows logi-
cally that a surprising move in the ope-
ning will often appear to go against these
general rules of good opening play. A
move that surprises your opponent is of
course not synonymous with a good
move. Thus. 1.f3 is surprising but also
bad.
The question of quality is an important
one. The opening variations that you will
find in this book are not the so-called
main lines. These lines are strong (which
is why (hey have become main lines), but
demand continuous study and will cert-
ainly not surprise your opponent. Are the
'surprise variations' presented in this
book less good than 'main lines'? Let us
not beat about the bush: from a certain
'objective' (Kasparov-like) viewpoint
they
will
indeed be 'weaker'. However,
the variations presented in this book have
all been played by grandmasters! Hence,
this should give you a certain guarantee
about their quality. Moreover, it is quite
possible that your results are better with a
variation that requires not
(00
much stu-
dy, surprises your opponent and is good
fun to play.
Let
us
consider the next element: What
secrets can this author reveal? In New in
Chess 1998/8 I wrote an article called
'Svidler's Opening Secret' about
a
Peter
Svidler speciality: l.d4 tLif6
2.c4 g6
3.~c3 d5 4.~g5 ~g7!?
Two issues on,
Svidler commented (in a game annotati-
on), with tongue-in-check, upon the logi-
cal inconsistency of that title: . if
it
really
was a secret [Jeroen Bosch] would not
know about it, right?'. So true, so true.
Apart from the novelties and the original
analyses in this book, there are no
.secrets' in the strictest sense of the word
in this book. The secretive element in this
book lies in presenting to the reader an
opening idea that he may not have known