xx Figures
Figure 2.24. The main questions, related to product development and some
related notions...................................................................................37
Figure 2.25. Model of the impact of some processes on product development.....37
Figure 2.26. Sample modelling classification........................................................39
Figure 2.27. Example classification of compatibility............................................42
Figure 2.28. Functionality types............................................................................44
Figure 2.29. Coverage and suitability of a model..................................................46
Figure 2.30. Coverage and granularity of compound models................................47
Figure 2.31. Conditions and prerequisites for (re)use of a product .......................51
Figure 2.32. Organization of software models ......................................................53
Figure 2.33. Criteria for defining layers................................................................55
Figure 2.34. Representation of the data, information and knowledge levels
for a simple model.............................................................................59
Figure 2.35. Inherencies of a data type..................................................................62
Figure 2.36. A simplified model of a system, advanced after Pahl and Beitz
(1993)................................................................................................65
Figure 2.37. A taxonomy of some system-related attributes, terms and
activities............................................................................................65
Figure 2.38. Inherencies of the systems engineering.............................................66
Figure 2.39. Sample classification of systems.......................................................67
Figure 2.40. An example classification of the data exchange. Reworked and
extended, after Avgoustinov (1997)..................................................70
Figure 2.41. Some integration techniques, after Gausemeier and Lückel
(2000)................................................................................................74
Figure 2.42. Example for a possible classification of the integration....................75
Figure 3.1. Some more important achievements in the CAE-history, after
Avgoustinov and Bley (2006)...........................................................82
Figure 3.2. Changeability and its derivatives, after Wiendahl (2002).................86
Figure 3.3. Changeability and its derivatives for (software) models, based
on the idea of Wiendahl (2002).........................................................87
Figure 3.4. Some consequences of complexity ...................................................89
Figure 3.5. Effort for exchange/porting depending on standardization grade .....92
Figure 3.6. Integration of models by means of data exchange ............................93
Figure 3.7. Standardization of the information exchange within a
production chain: dividing in several sub-domains, after
Avgoustinov (1997) ..........................................................................94
Figure 3.8. Complexity of an interdisciplinary model: layers and aspects..........98
Figure 3.9. Individual limits by perception of complex matter ...........................99
Figure 3.10. Dependence of decision making on complexity..............................100
Figure 3.11. Focusing by splitting/reducing the scope to keep the complexity
controllable .....................................................................................100
Figure 3.12. Systems of points and connecting lines with increasing (from
left to right) complexity ..................................................................102
Figure 3.13. Systems of 4 points and different combinations of connecting
line segments...................................................................................102
Figure 3.14. Interrelations of model complexity with other concepts and
terms................................................................................................104
Figure 3.15. Distribution of the complexity within a given hierarchy.................106