HPLC
and column liquid chromatography
3
69
column to separate alkene-free gasolines into saturates, monoaromatics, diaro-
matics, tri/polyaromatics and polar groups. Each group was quantified by
an
RI
detector into weight percentage abundance. Calibration samples were obtained
by fractionation of a fuel sample rather than by use of single pure compounds in
an effort to minimize compositional and
RI
response factor differences.
Both Apffel and McNair and Munari
et
al.
used on-line HPLC-GCRID meth-
ods to analyse gasoline saturates, unsaturates, aromatics and polar compounds.
The latter authors employed a retention gap between the two chromatographic
systems and microbore HPLC columns. Hayes and Anderson used off-line
HPLC
with a dielectric constant detector to achieve an accurate group type sepa-
ration and quantitation of gasoline with uniform response factors from the detec-
tor. The mobile phase was 2,2-dichloro-1,
1
,
1-trifluoroethane (Envron 123). The
individual fractions were then analyzed by GCMSD to identify components and
GC/FID to quantify them. The authors reported that spent Envron 123 can be re-
used several times without purification or easily redistilled on
a
continuous
basis.
Kerosenes have been characterized also by some of the authors previously
cited [51,53,55].
In
addition, Haw
et
al.
[56]
used a propylamino silica column
with on-line
NMR
as
the detector.
Ln
this case, the mobile phase was
l,l,l-
trichlorotrifluoroethane with
2.5%
deuterochloroform and
0.05%
hexamethyld-
isiloxane as
NMR
reference. Each compound class (monocyclic and dicyclic
aromatics) could be given an average composition. The average composition of
the saturate fraction was, however, limited by problems in accounting for qua-
ternary carbon. Davies
et
al.
[57] utilized the LC-retention gap-GCRID ap-
proach to a kerosene sample with microbore amino and silica glass-lined LC
columns in series with pentane eluent and backflushing. Unfortunately, the low
dead volume of detectors required for microbore LC precluded conventional
RI
or
dielectric constant detectors and thus direct quantitation of the saturate and
aromatic fractions prior to GC was not possible. The system was automatic and
clearly improved the analysis of the aromatic fractions.
Diesel and distillate fuels have been studied by all the methods described for
crudes, gasolines and kerosenes [52,53,57]. Silica and amino columns have been
used to separate diesel into saturates, olefins and aromatics with
RI
and/or
UV
quantitation by Felix
et
al.
[58].
Davies
et
al.
[59]
used the LC-GC technique
previously described, but with specific reference to polynuclear aromatics in die-
sel fuel. The chromatographic system described by these authors produced a
complete fractionation by compound class but in this study emphasis was placed
on the definition of a two-dimensional (LC versus GC) retention map for se-
lected PAHs. By comparison, the retention indices of aromatic compounds from
the diesel sample led the authors to conclude that naphthalene, phenanthrene and
their alkyl derivatives were the predominant aromatics present.
Refeences pp.
3 72-3 74