data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03c6e/03c6e82a6e2fb405c329703f07f34b546e9ff36c" alt=""
Paper P2: Corporate Reporting (International)
76 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP
the subsidiary and treat it as a discontinued operation in accordance with IFRS 5
Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations.
If a parent actually loses control over an entity which has been a subsidiary, it is
no longer a subsidiary, even if the parent still holds more than 50% of its equity
shares. This means that it does not have to be consolidated. This may be the case
where there are long-term restrictions in place that make it impossible to control
the entity. IAS 27 states that it should not be consolidated. This may happen if
the subsidiary is located in a foreign country and the laws of that country do not
allow the repatriation of funds to the parent company.
Exception to the rule
There is an exception to this rule. A parent need not present consolidated financial
statements if (and only if) all the following conditions apply:
The parent itself (X) is a wholly-owned subsidiary, with its own parent (Y).
Alternatively, the parent (X) is a partially-owned subsidiary, with its own parent
(Y), and the other owners of X are prepared to allow it to avoid preparing
consolidated financial statements.
The parent’s debt or equity instruments are not traded in a public market.
The parent does not file its financial statements with a securities commission for
the purpose of issuing financial instruments in a public market.
The parent’s own parent, or the ultimate parent company (for example, the
parent of the parent’s parent), does produce consolidated financial statements
for public use that comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Special purpose entities (SPEs) and consolidation
A group may include companies that are known as special purpose entities (SPEs)
or special purpose vehicles (SPVs). These companies are established in such a way
that the ‘parent’ company does not have legal control over the SPE, although some
form of effective control does exist. SIC Interpretation 12 states that special purpose
entities (SPEs) should be consolidated in the normal way for subsidiaries where the
substance of the relationship between the reporting entity and the SPE indicates that
the SPE is controlled by the reporting entity (even though legally a parent-
subsidiary relationship does not exist).
The term ‘special purpose entity’ is not defined by SIC 12.
SIC 12 provides examples of circumstances in which control of an SPE may exist
in substance:
− the SPE carries on activities on behalf of the reporting entity
− the reporting entity has decision-making powers over the SPE, and
− the reporting entity has rights to the majority of the benefits and has
exposure to significant risks of the SPE.