data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16c66/16c6675951ddf7374467b7c74f233ca2c1655e96" alt=""
Paper P1: Governance, risk and ethics
304 © Emile Woolf Publishing Limited
Step 2. The decision-maker must be able to recognise and select the course of
action that is morally correct.
Step 3. The decision-maker must give priority to the moral issue above all other
considerations (for example, self-interest).
Step 4. The decision-maker must have enough moral strength to implement the
decision that he selects in Steps 2 and 3.
Some research has indicated that accountants, on the whole, are poor at taking
ethical decisions. In many cases, they treat a problem as a technical accounting issue
and fail to see any ethical implications at all.
Many accountants see their role in technical terms, without concern for values or
moral issues. They are rule-followers, more concerned with identifying what the
technical rules are and following them, rather than applying their own personal
values to resolve moral dilemmas.
Critical theory and accounting: a summary
It has been argued that traditional accounting supports ethical reporting and
decision-making, and promotes economic and social well-being through its
provision of information to users.
The views of critical accountants can be summarised as follows:
‘If all agents [groups] were equal and if markets were information-efficient and if
this led to allocative efficiency and if this led, in turn, to economic growth and if
this ensured maximum social welfare and if maximum social welfare were the aim
of society, then accounting is morally, economically and socially justifiable and may
lay claim to an intellectual framework. Of course, this is not the case’ (Gray, Owen
and Adams: ‘Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in corporate
Social and Environmental Reporting’).
1.7 Accountants and acting against the public interest
As stated earlier, accountants may be rule-followers. Technical rules are provided
by financial reporting standards and other reporting regulations.
A function of the professional accountancy bodies is to provide rules of conduct and
ethical behaviour, with the expectation that all members should follow the rules.
Accountants might not be moral by nature, but they can be taught to think and act
ethically.
Occasional problems will inevitably arise when some accountants choose a different
set of rules, or deliberately break the rules. The consequences depend on the nature
of the rule-breaking. In an extreme case such as Enron, breaking the rules by
accountants contributed significantly to the collapse of the company. Even in the
Enron case, the accountants who were prosecuted and imprisoned did not
necessarily understand what they had done wrong. They were simply doing the
same as other people, and adopting the culture of the company.