data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401ac/401acf65d6767b3fc8637c846b4719236293e687" alt=""
Paper P1: Governance, risk and ethics
302 © Emile Woolf Publishing Limited
The public continues to believe that the accountancy profession is an ethical
profession that offers some protection to society against the ‘excesses’ of
capitalism.
A role of the accountancy bodies should be to reinforce this public perception of an
ethical profession. They do this by issuing codes of conduct, including codes of
ethics, and expecting all their members to comply.
1.6 Ethics and accountants: critical theory
The ethical codes of accountancy bodies are described in more detail later in this
chapter.
First, however, it might be useful to consider some differing views about
accountants, that accountants and the accountancy profession do not necessarily act
in the public interest and in some ways they might act against it. The perception that
the accountancy profession has of itself, that it is a defender of ethical principles in
business and government, might not be correct.
The nature of critical theory
Critical theory is an approach to research and investigation used by many
universities for many different academic disciplines, including accountancy. Critical
theory originated with the Frankfurt School in the mid-20
th
Century. It is an
approach to analysing aspects of society (such as accounting and the accountancy
profession) based on an ethical view and a belief that there is a need for
improvement and change. The original inspiration for critical theory was the work
of Marx and Hegel. For example, some critical theorists argue that an organisation’s
culture can be seen as a tool for repression, and domination (by managers and
owners), and for the maintenance and reproduction of a dominant group. One aim
of critical theory is to make people think again about their perceptions and
attitudes, and the ways in which they think.
Critical theory and accounting (‘critical accounting’)
Critical theory in accounting (sometimes called ‘critical accounting’) challenges the
traditional view that accountants are objective individuals, free from bias and
influence (‘value-free’) and with technical expertise, who are able to present reality
in the information they provide.
Critical accountants would make the following arguments, in support of their view
that accounting is not objective.
Accounting information is not objective and value-free. It was developed as a
tool for government and business leaders, to help them maintain their position
of power within society. Traditional financial reporting, for example, helps
business leaders to retain control over the companies they run. Its main focus is
on shareholders and profits. Different interest groups (such as shareholders and
employees) are treated differently and some individuals have more and better
access to accounting information than others.
Accounting is not objective because it is a social as well as a technical process. In
any given situation or context, different accountants may have different views,