Paper F8: Audit and assurance (International)
420 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP
The number of items to be tested will depend on the level of assurance
required by the auditor and also the error rate which he is prepared to
accept.
To determine which particular transactions are included within the
sample, the auditor may use any one of a number of selection techniques
including interval sampling, random sampling (using random number
tables), cluster sampling or block sampling.
There will also be areas within the sales system where the volume of
transactions is not great, such as:
month-end reconciliations
month-end, or period-end, postings to the nominal ledger
the write-off of bad debts.
In these circumstances the use of statistical techniques will not be
appropriate because valid conclusions cannot be drawn when
population sizes are small.
In such cases, judgemental sampling would be more appropriate.
However, the auditor should carefully consider which and how many
items should be tested. For example, if the auditor is aware that the sales
ledger manager/controller was on holiday in the month of August, he
may decide that testing transactions in that month should be considered.
(ii) In the direct confirmation of trade receivables (circularisation)
Before deciding on whether to use statistics or judgement for the
selection of receivables in a circularisation, the auditor must establish
the purpose of the circularisation.
If the circularisation is part of the auditor’s systems work, to establish
that the system is working as prescribed, he should use statistical
techniques.
The auditor must first establish the level of assurance he requires, (i.e.
how certain he wants to be that the results of the sample are truly
representative of the population). Then, based on an acceptable error
rate (“tolerable misstatement”), a sample size can be established.
It may be appropriate for the auditor to divide the sales ledger balances
into two populations – the first being all of the debit balances, and the
second being all of the credit balances. The credit balances should be
subject to separate and more extensive tests because they have a higher
probability of being inaccurate.
If the circularisation is to be used as a means of verifying year-end trade
receivables, the auditor will attempt to prove as large a proportion of
debts as possible using the most cost-effective means.
The auditor should consider dividing the balances into tiers or strata
with each stratum being the subject of separate examination (referred to
as “stratification”). The high value stratum of receivables can then be the
subject of more extensive testing.