Proceedings of ISES Solar World Congress 2007: Solar Energy and Human Settlement
580
(1 ) 0
22
ff
εε εε
εε εε
−−
+− =
++
(1)
where f
M
is the volume fraction of metallic component, ε
stands for dielectric functions, indexed by M for the metal,
D for the dielectric component respectively, and ε
BR
for
dielectric function of metal-dielectric composite obtained
from Bruggeman model.
The optimization of the spectral selectivity is made from
the optical reflectance of a modeled absorber coating in the
wavelength range 0.3 to 30 µm in order to cover the
spectral range of the solar radiation as well as the range for
the main part of the thermal radiation. The absorber is
modeled as a two-dimensional stack of layers of
homogeneous thickness, with smooth front surface and
interfaces between the layers and in-plane infinite
dimension neglecting edge effects.
As reported in [4], three-layer (base-layer, middle-layer,
and anti-reflection layer on the top) is a simple structure
with good spectral selectivity where the base-layer is the
main solar absorbing layer in this structure. So we only
analyze a single absorbing layer for further simplification.
For a single film on a substrate, the total amplitude
reflection is [5]
2
21
2
21
1
δ
δ
i
i
err
err
r
−
−
+
+
=
(2)
where r
1
, r
2
presents represents the amplitude reflection at
the surface (air/thin film), and film/substrate interface
respectively. For normal incidence, the phase change in the
thin film is given as
2
d
π
δ
λ
=− ⋅
(3)
where d
1
is the film thickness, λ is the vacuum wavelength
of the incident light, N
1
represents the complex optical
constants of thin film material.
In order to study intrinsic and interference-induced
absorption of thin film, the phase factor
2 δi
e
−
in equation
(3) can be expressed as
(cos(4 / ) sin(4 / ))endindπλ πλ⋅⋅+⋅
(4)
Substituting 4n
1
d
1
/λ with the interference order parameter
m
1
[6], equation (5) can be simplified as
24/
(cos( ) sin( ))
ikd
ee mim
δπλ
ππ
−⋅ −⋅⋅
=⋅ +
(5)
The subscript in equation (5) was omitted for discussion of
one layer. The phase factor shows explicitly the influence
of both intrinsic absorption determined by the extinction
coefficient, k, and interference-induced absorption
determined by the refractive index, n. As n and k are
interrelated, their values cannot be varied independently.
Their optical response cannot be separated but we will in
the following analysis use them and distinguish important
features for obtaining good spectrally selective solar
absorbers.
The extinction coefficient determines the light attenuation
in the interior of the film. The periodic terms in equation (5)
determines the phase shift of light in the interface passages
and as such they will influence the transition from low to
high reflectance between the solar and infrared wavelength
range. The term cos(mπ) indicates the wavelength position
of the first optical interference minimum for m=1. The term
sin(mπ) gives a pure imaginary phase factor and indicates
the wavelength of high reflectance for m=0.5. We have
found that m=0.5 is positioned on the long wavelength side
of the reflectance transition.
The ideal optical response regarding its intrinsic optical
constants requires a high enough extinction coefficient in
the solar wavelength range to give a total attenuation for a
light passing the distance of 2d. The ideal response
regarding a steep reflectance transition between the solar
and thermal wavelength ranges is governed by optical
interference and a narrow wavelength range between the
wavelengths positions for m=0.5 and m=1. This will be
determined by the dispersion of the refractive index. It is
also required that the extinction is low in the transition
wavelength range as well as in the remaining infrared
range.