THE YAMATO KINGDOM 109
Japan came to be ruled by horse-riding warriors who had invaded the
islands from north Asia,3 and Ishimoda Sho reexamined ancient
sources and found a heroic
age.*
But our knowledge of what was really
occurring between the rule in the third century of Queen Himiko
(reported in the
Wei chih)
and the reign from 592 to 628 of Empress
Suiko (who reestablished relations with China) continued to be quite
hazy and imprecise.
Much new research has been done in the last two or three decades,
permitting us to see at long last the general outlines of a process by
which clan control in the third century was replaced by a sinicized,
bureaucratic state in the seventh century. Probably no other period in
Japanese history has been subjected to so much illumination in such a
short time. The new light has come from a number of directions.
First, numerous historians - freed from prewar restraints against the
critical study of Japan's sacred origins - have analyzed eighth-century
chronicles, attempting to distinguish myth from history and to assess
interactions between the two.5 Other historians have looked closely at
diverse sources and seen the rise and expansion of Yamato from a
"broad East Asian perspective.
6
Religious historians, mythologists,
3 Egami Namio, in his Kiba
minzoku
kokka (Tokyo: Chuokoronsha, 1967), used archaeological,
mythological, and historical data on early non-Japanese peoples of northeast Asia to support
his conclusion that Sujin was a Korean king who invaded Japan with horse-riding soldiers
during the first half of the fourth century and that the Yamato state was founded in the last half
of the fourth century when the Kyushu center of power was moved to central Japan. His basic
thesis has been further developed, with an extensive use of Korean sources, by Gari Ledyard
in "Galloping Along with the Horse-Riders: Looking for the Founders of
Japan,"
Journal of
Japanese Studies 1 (1975): 217-54. Recent archaeological investigations of ancient mounds
located in southeastern section of the Nara plain suggest that Yamato came into existence long
before the final years of the fourth century, but they provide no convincing evidence that this
kingdom was created by foreign invaders. This and other weaknesses of the Egami thesis were
revealed in Walter Edwards, "Event and Process in the Founding of
Japan:
The Horserider
Theory in Archaeological
Perspective,"
Journal of Japanese Studies 9 (Summer 1983): 265-95;
and in Edward Kidder, Jr., "The Archaeology of the Early Horse-Riders in Japan," Transac-
tions
of
the
Asiatic Society of Japan 20,3rd series (1985): 89-123. Egami nevertheless sharpened
interest in continental cultural influence on Japanese life during the Yamato period.
4 In his Nihon no kodai kokka (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1971), Ishimoda Sho concluded that
Japan's heroic age came between the third and fifth centuries. Ishimoda made important
contributions that have been clouded by disputes over the definition of terms and periods and
overshadowed by massive amounts of new archaeological data.
5 Ueda Masaaki provides an excellent summary in his Okimi no seiki, vol. 2 of
Nihon
no
rekishi
(Tokyo: Shogakkan, 1975). Important studies can be found in Kodai, vols. 2-4 of Asao
Naohiro, Ishi Susumu, Inoue Mitsusada, Oishi Kaichiro, et al., eds., Iwanami koza: Nihon
rekishi
(Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1975-76). Cornelius J. Kiley carefully analyzed kinship and
state development in his "State and Dynasty in Arcahic
Yamato,"
Journal
of Asian Studies 33
(November 1973): 25-49.
6 A pioneer work is Kito Kiyoaki's Nihon kodai kokka no keisei to
higashi
Ajia (Tokyo: Azekura
shobo, 1976). Suzuki Yasutami has outlined recent studies of early Japanese history from an
East Asian perspective, in his "Ajia shominzoku no kokka keisei to Yamato oken," Genshi-
kodai, vol. 1 of Koza:
Nihon-rekishi
(Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku shuppankai, 1984), pp. 193-232.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008