546 MID-YOAN POLITICS
Heng, a private historian, states explicitly that he was poisoned and that El
Temiir directed his murder.
249
Late in 1340 Toghon Temiir khaghan (Em-
peror Shun-ti, r. 1333-70), Khoshila's son, blamed Tugh Temiir for his
father's death and, in revenge, posthumously expelled the latter from the
Imperial Shrine.
2
'
0
Khoshila's failure to win the throne as a "steppe candidate," as his father
had done twenty years earlier, is seen by some historians as reflecting the final
passing of the steppe frontier as a factor in Yuan politics and the triumph of
the Yuan dynasty over the Mongolian empire.
2
'' Certainly the importance of
the princes in the steppe region seems to have decreased after the restoration
of intra-Mongolian peace in 1303 and the establishment of the bureaucratic
Branch Secretariat of Ling-pei in Mongolia during Khaishan's reign. This
fact, however, had not prevented the seizure of the throne by Yesiin Temiir in
1323 as a "steppe candidate" in close collaboration with the conspirators in
Shidebala's court.
More important were the vast differences between Khoshila and his father
in regard to the bureaucratic support they enjoyed in the capital and the
military power at their disposal. As the princely overseers of all forces in the
steppe region, Khaishan had always been a part of the Yuan imperial estab-
lishment and had kept in close contact with the court. He thus was the
favored candidate of the bureaucratic establishment in the capital under the
leadership of Harghasun when the succession crisis had broken out, and
although at first Ayurbarwada gained control of the court, he dared only to
assume the title of regent, not the imperial title.
By contrast, Khoshila had been a political refugee in distant Central Asia
for twelve years, and by the time of the regicide, Tugh Temiir and El Temiir
had already created their own powerful political machinery in China, to
which Khoshila was a complete stranger. Moreover, as the supreme com-
mander of the most powerful field army in the empire, Khaishan had taken
thirty thousand men with him when he set out to contend for the throne,
whereas Khoshila, as an erstwhile refugee, brought with him to Onggho-
chatu only eighteen hundred guardsmen and so stood no chance whatever of
overpowering his younger brother by force.
2
'
2
Khoshila's failure to capture
the throne, therefore, should be attributed to his personal status as a political
249 Ch'iian Heng,
Keng sben
wai
shih,
in
Poo yen
t'angpi cbi, ed. Ch'en Chi-ju (1906; repr. Taipei, 1965),
p.
ib; Helmut Shulte-Uffelage, trans, and ed., Das
Keng-shen
wai-sbih: Eim Quelle zur
spdten
Mon-
golenzeil, Ostasiatische Forschungen, Sonderreihe Monographien no. 2 (Berlin, 1963), p. 27.
250 YS, 40, p. 856.
231 For example, to Dardess, "Khaishan's accession was the product of an as-yet unstabilized frontier,"
but his effective integration of Mongolia into an imperial system whose controlling authority lay in
China and not in Mongolia made it "impossible for his eldest son to follow in his footsteps." See
Dardess,
Conquerors
and
Confucians,
p. 30.
252 Hsiao Kung-ch'in, "Lun Yuan tai huang wei chi ch'eng wen t'i," p. 33.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008