THE
VOWELS. 41
1)
Instead
of
sea,
sco
there is a
frequent
occurrence
of
scea,
sceo
:
sceacan,
scoc,
sceacen,
shake
(392)
and
scacan, scoc,
scacen
;
seadau and
scadan,
separate
;
scamu,
scomu,
and
sceamu,
sceomu,
shame; scop
and
sceop,
poet;
scoli
and
sce"oh,
shoe.
This
variation
is
an
extremely
irregular
one,
not
only
in
regard
to the
spelling
of
single
words,
but also
to
the
usage
in the
different texts.
2)
In
most cases
scu
remains unaffected:
scua,
shadow
;
scucca,
demon
;
scrifan,
shove
;
sculdor,
shoulder
;
sciir,
shower.
Not till LWS.
do
we encounter
single
instances
of
sceu,
like
sceucca, sc^ufan,
and
somewhat more
frequently
eo
:
sceocca,
sc^ofan,
sce"or.
3)
No
change
is
experienced
by
scy:
scyld,
guilt;
scyndan,
hasten;
scyte,
shot,
etc.
NOTE 2. Even in
EWS.,
sceo
is a
frequent
substitute for
scu
in
the verb
sceolan,
shall,
beside sculan
(423)
;
plur.
sceolun,
beside
sculun.
The
preterit
sceolde
for scolde
is likewise of
surprisingly
frequent
occurrence.
NOTE
3. The
umlaut-^
derived from
Q
(89.
2)
remains
unchanged
in
sce_nc,
goblet,
sce,ncean, pour
out,
but is
nearly always
diphthongized
in
sciendan
(scindan, scyndan), disgrace,
as is
e,
the umlaut
of
6
(94),
in
gescy,
shoes
(for
gescie,
Ps. North,
gescoe).
NOTE 4.
In
LWS.,
e
is even
occasionally
inserted between sc and
and
a,
o
in a final
syllable:
me,nnescea,
human
being,
Egiptiscea,
Ebreisceo, Wyliscea,
etc.
NOTE
5. On
account of
the
confusion which
prevails among
the
phenomena
described
in
76.
2,
they
are not to
be
classed,
without
further
question,
with those of 75
(and 74),
which
are
consistently
carried out
in
WS.
It is not at
all
impossible that,
to some
extent,
the
e
may
have been inserted between
sc
and
one of the
guttural
vowels,
to indicate
that
sc
had
the
pronunciation
of
sh
(German sell).
Indeed,
some scholars
assign
the same
explanation
to
the
ea,
le
of
75,
or
in
other words assert
that
they
merely
indicate the
palatal
pronun-
ciation of the
g,
c,
sc
(cf
.
206-
6)
;
and,
consequently,
that
ea
is
merely