387
Elliott Carter’s string quartets or Xenakis’s stochastic constructions. Living
composers such as Adams, Glass, Reich, and Arvo Pärt have acquired a
semblance of a mass following. And a few far-sighted orchestras have put
modern repertory front and center: in 2003, the Los Angeles Philharmonic,
under the visionary direction of Esa-Pekka Salonen, inaugurated Walt Disney
Concert Hall with a program that included Ligeti’s Lux aeterna, Ives’s The
Unanswered Question, and, naturally, the Rite.
There is little hope of giving a tidy account of composition in the second fin de
siècle. Styles of every description—minimalism, post-minimalism, electronic
music, laptop music, Internet music, New Complexity, Spectralism, doomy
collages and mystical meditations from Eastern Europe and Russia,
appropriations of rock, pop, and hip-hop, new experiments in folkloristic music
in Latin America, the Far East, Africa, and the Middle East—jostle against one
another, none achieving supremacy. Some have tried to call the era
postmodern, but “modernism” is already so equivocal a term that to affix a
“post” pushes it over the edge into meaninglessness. In retrospect, modernism,
in the sense of a unified vanguard, never existed. The twentieth century was
always a time of “many streams,” a “delta,” in the wise words of John Cage.
What follows is an aerial tour of an ever-changing landscape.
As the behemoth of mass
culture breaks up into a melee of subcultures and niche markets, as the Internet
weakens the media’s stranglehold on cultural distribution, there is reason to
think that classical music, and with it new music, can find fresh audiences in far-
flung places.
Composing remains, as Thomas Mann’s Devil says, “desperately difficult.”
Although vast quantities of music are being written down day by day—national
websites display lists of 450 composers in Australia, 650 composers in Canada,
several thousand in the Nordic countries—few of them have found an audience
outside a relatively limited clique of new-music fanciers. Some specialize in
“music for use,” writing for church choirs or collegiate wind bands or the
soundtracks of video games. The majority make a living by teaching
composition, and their students usually become teachers themselves. They
may sometimes ask, with the title character of Hans Pfitzner’s Palestrina,
Perhaps Ligeti was right; perhaps classical composition is being sustained past
its date of expiration by the stubborn determination of those who perform it,
those who support it, and, above all, those who write it. More likely, though, a
thousand-year-old tradition won’t expire with the flipping of a calendar or the
aging of a baby-boom cohort. Confusion is often a prelude to consolidation; we
may even be on the verge of a new golden age. For now, the art is like the
“sunken cathedral” that Debussy depicts in his Preludes for Piano—a city that
chants beneath the waves.
“What
is it for?” They have read in books that their forebears humbled kings, electrified
crowds, forged nations. Sooner or later they realize that modern popular culture
has no place for a composer hero. The most celebrated composers are
sometimes the unhappiest; György Ligeti, in his last years, was reportedly
haunted by the feeling that he would be forgotten after his death, that he had
outlived the age in which music mattered.