319 
 
mechanics of oppression,” and specifically as “an allegory of homosexual 
oppression.” The Canadian tenor Jon Vickers, by contrast, played Grimes as a 
damaged brute, one who sways between heartbreaking lyricism and heartless 
violence. Britten obviously sided with Pears’s portrayal, but Vickers’s scalding 
performances pulled out hidden layers of the score. 
Everything about Grimes is ambiguous. On first encounter, it looks to be an 
opera in the nineteenth-century tradition, stocked with arias, duets, choruses, 
and other set forms. Yet the inherited forms periodically splinter apart or stop 
short, as if overcome by emotions that the composer knows are too complex to 
be resolved in song. This is opera that presses constantly at the borders of the 
genre, whether high or low: it bursts with folk song, operetta and vaudeville 
tunes, and the vernacular punch of the American musical, and, at the same 
time, it erupts in twentieth-century dissonances. In many ways, Grimes is an 
English Wozzeck, extending sympathy to an ugly man, using his crimes to indict 
the society that sired him. Or, as Britten put it, in his no-nonsense way: “The 
more vicious the society, the more vicious the individual.” 
The scene is set with a bustling, businesslike Prologue. Grimes testifies at an 
inquest into the death of his first apprentice, who, in this version, dies of 
dehydration at sea. “Peter Grimes! Peter Grimes! Peter Grimes!” cries the 
village carrier—this tragedy will unfold against accusatory repetitions of the title 
character’s name. Throughout the introductory scene, the music points up 
fractures beneath Aldeburgh’s tidy surface: potential key centers jostle against 
each other, major and minor triads are clouded over extraneous notes, clotted 
chords appear in the lower brass. 
Britten’s psychological precision in setting the English language is obvious from 
the start. Like Janáček, he purposefully matches his vocal lines to the rhythms 
of conversation, oratory, and dispute. Notice how he treats a simple little 
question that the lawyer Swallow poses to Grimes—“Why did you do this?” A 
prosecutor throwing out this phrase in court would lift his voice a little after the 
“Why” and emphasize the “did” and the “do,” which is just what Swallow does. 
As the scene goes on, the initial notes of the phrase—think of the first four 
notes of “Auld Lang Syne” in quick, even rhythm—take on a symbolic function, 
representing chatter, gossip, rumor. “How long were you at sea?” Swallow asks. 
“Three days,” Grimes replies. At that, oboes and bassoons play the gossip motif 
twice, staccato and crescendo. Later, it is picked up by all the winds and 
becomes a driving ostinato, over which the chorus voices its growing suspicions 
of Grimes. Hatred of the outsider will be the moral focus by which these upright 
citizens organize themselves. 
At first, Grimes is a blurry presence, trying to make himself heard above the din. 
But his pride, impatience, and belligerence soon show through. “Let me thrust 
into their mouths the truth itself,” he sings. In a duet with Ellen Orford, the 
kindhearted schoolteacher, he reveals an alternate persona, one of keening 
vulnerability. There follows Britten’s great orchestral evocation of the heaving 
ocean on a cold gray morning—the first of six interludes in the opera, illustrating 
different facets of the sea. Interestingly, some of the ocean’s motifs have