< previous page page_276 next page >
Page 276
by quantitative metathesis, the position of the accent betraying the originally short final vowel. An alternative
explanation, which starts with a declensional pattern *polei-s/ polj-os, etc., with a levelling to *polej-os etc., hardly
seems preferable, for this analogical generalization would have to be dated before the proto-Greek change *poleis
to poleis (Osthoff's Law), while the insertion of polis, polin in this levelled declension would remain without
explanation. In all dialects except Attic the stem form -i was extended throughout the declension:
, etc. The accusative form owes its ending to the consonant stems.
In the u-stems type 1 is represented by *doru >
, *dorwos > , *dorwei > , *dorwH2 > ,
*dorwon >
. In the type 2 the original inflexions were: singular, *-us, *-ou, *-um, *-eus, *-ewei, *-eu;
plural *-ewes, *-uns, *-uwom, *-usu. In Greek the e-grade, as with -i/-ei stems, was extended to all cases except
the nominative, vocative and accusative singular: e.g.
, with the plural < ,
(< ), . In Attic the genitive is , where the accent indicates an earlier , with a
grade which might be traced to the vrddhied locative form in *-eu. It is conceivable, however, that a word like
might have been influenced by the declension of so that parallels . In non-Attic dialects
the genitive singular has , and this is found even in Attic in the u-adjectives, e.g. < *swadewos,
this being a refashioning of the expected
. *suju- 'son' shows forms belonging to both declensional types:
(Cretan), (Attic), (Cretan), (Homer) < *suwjos, (Homer) < *sujwi, (Homer) < *sujwes,
(Cretan> < *sujuns.. The full-grade suffix -ew- also appears in > .
Mycenaean presents the dative form ijewe, plausibly interpreted as hijewei, with nominative iju = hijus, both with
dissimilatory loss of the first u. Dissimilation was also presumably responsible for the passage to the thematic class
, etc. (Homer, etc.). To the u- stems also belong the diphthongal stems of the type , and . The root
*dei- 'shine' with u-suffixation gave rise to the base forms I *dei-w- (Latin deivos/divus) and II *dj-ew-. From the
latter comes the vrddhied nominative *dj-eu-s. In the accusative the IE form *dje-m, with
< previous page page_276 next page >