1.1. The phoneme (it’s aspects,
modifications). Methods of
phonological analysis.
The idea of the phenomenon (the phoneme)
was not formulated until the mid 30s of the
20
th
cent.
The 1
st
gr of scholars (the Prague school –
N. Trubetskoy). One of the most detailed
definitions (Vjacheslav Vasilyev): the
phoneme is the main linguistic unit realizes
in speech in the form of speech sounds and
apposable to other phonemes of the same
language to distinguish the meaning of
words.
Phoneme – 3 aspects:
a) Functional
The function of every component of the
phonetic system is discriminative – the
distinction of one word from another.
The opposition of ph. in the same phonetic
environment differentiates morphemes and
words (ex. Sleeper-sleepy – morphemes;
light-like - words).
b) Material
The ph. is realized in speech in the form of
allophones.
/d/ - occlusive, plosive, forelingual, apical,
alveolar, lenise, voiced.
Principle allophones – don’t undergo any
distinguishable changes in the chain of
speech.
Subsidiary allophones – modify in phonetic
circumstances (ex. Before another occlusive
consonant [d] is produced w/out any plosion
– bad times; before [r] it becomes post-
alveolar – dry, dream).
Allophones of the same ph never
occur in the similar phonetic
contexts
They are entirely predictable acc.
to the phonetic environment.
In actual speech the ph are modified by the
following factors: phono-stylistic, dialectial,
individual.
Most of the info about the ph – not from
phonemic (abstract) distinctions but from
phonetic (material) ones. Phonetic evidence
is esp important for lexical& gram meaning
awa for stylistic aspects of any
communication.
c) Abstract
You can’t change even 1 feature w/out
changing the meaning
Ex. /d/ voiced - /t/ voiceless
/d/ forelingual (day) -/g/ backlingual (gay)
The articulatory features which form the
invariant of the phoneme – relevant.
(irrelevant – ex. Aspiration in the system of
eng sounds)
Methods
Ph-s can be discovered by the method of
minimal pairs (finding pairs of words which
differ in 2 ph only). All the ph of any lang
form a system of oppositions in which 1 ph
is usually opposed to any other ph in at
least one position. If the substitution of 1
sound for another results in the change of
meaning the communicative sounds are
different phonemes. The method helps to
prove whether the phonemic difference
relevant or not, whether the opposition is sg,
double or multiple.
Sg op-n: /t/ - /d/ only one distinctive feature:
voiceless – voiced (time - dime)
Double: /p/ - /d/: voiceless ,fortis – voiced,
lenis;
bilabial – forelingual ( pay –
day)
Multiple: /b/ - /h/: voiced lenis – voiceless
1.3. The main types of phonetic
modifications
Consonants
Ph mod-ns take place w/in the words
which are connected and at their
boundaries. All the sounds are prone
to change.
Assimilation is the adaptive
modification of a consonant by a
neighbouring consonant in the speech
chain.
Can be:
1) progressive (a sound is
influenced by a preceding sound)
ex. Bridge – score
[dζ]→[s]→[ς]
lenis – fortis - fortis
lingular
forelingual
apical
palate-alveolar – alveolar – palate-
alveolar
occlusive-constrictive – constr – const
noise-noise
bicentral – unicentral – bicentral
oral
2) regressive (anticipatory) the
sound is influenced by the
following sound
ten balloons
[m]←[n] [b], because [b] is bilabial
Good night – both alveolar, but [d]
disappears, because of [n] → g’ night
3) partial – only one or several
distinctive features are modified
and sounds become similar
(bridge score)
4) complete – the sound becomes
absolutely similar to the
influencing sound in all distinctive
features (good night)
5) coalescence – a mutual
influence, where two sounds
fuse into a sg new one
won’t she? [w∂Ụtςi]
alveolar, occlusive, plosive [t] and
palate-alveolar, constrictive [ς] →[tς] –
palate-alveolar, a new sound –
affricate (occlusive-constr), partial ass-
n
Practically in all cases – the change of
the place of articulation
Then the manner of articulation:
-loss of plosion (glad to see u);
-nasal (not now)
-lateral (table, at last)
Accommodation is the adaptive
modification of V+C or C+V type.
Affects lip position →labialization of
consonants: appears under the
influence of the neighbouring back
vowels: pool, woman
It’s also possible to speak ab the
spread lip position of consonants
followed or preceded by front vowels
[i] – meet and [i:] – team, meat
Such sounds as [r], [tς], [dζ] are
pronounced by most speakers w/
rounded lips ever after [i:].
In the casual discourse: in the
intervocalic position voiceless cons-ts
change their voicing value and
become voiced: [t] → [d] (letter)
Elision (zero reduction) is the loss of
sounds. Min – in slow, careful speech;
max – in rapid, careless speech
1) loss of [h] is widespread
here he is ['iәr i iz]
1.4. Relevant/irrelevant articulatory
features of consonants and vowels
The majority of phoneticians name 3
articul. features of consonants which are
relevant:
1) Work of the vocal cords and the force
of exalation
Voiced (lenis) – voiceless (fortis)
B, d, g, z p, t, k, s
2) Active organ of speech and the place
of obstruction
Labial – lingual – glottal
P, b, w, f – k, d, t, s, g – h
3) Manner of the production of noise
and a type of obstruction
Occlusive (stops) – constrictive
P,b,k,d,t f,θ,∂,l,ς
/there are ph-s called affricates (occlusive-
constr). These sounds are complex.
There’re 2 elements that are distinctly
heard there. 2 types of obstruction at the
same time – occlusive-constr [tς], [dζ]/
Dif-nt opinions concerning what type of
opposition should be considered important
I. Vasilyev: the type of obstruction+the
manner of the production of noise –
basis for clas-n
i. Occlusive (w/out complete
obstruction)
ii. Constrictive (w/ an incomplete
obstruction)
The phonological relevance of this feature
can be proved by the method of min pairs:
t-s →tea-sea; p-f →pull-full
each of the 2 classes is subdivided into:
Noise
Sonorants
Acc to the prevailing factor: noise-tone
(the degree of noise), noise cons-ts are
divided into (manner of articul-n):
1) Plosive (stops)
2) Affricates
Constrictive sonorants’re divided into
(place of articul-n):
1) Medial
2) Lateral
II. Others: the degree of noise – the
main feature:
1) Noise
a) Occlusive
b) Constrictive
c) Occlus.-constr
2) Sonorants
a)occlusive
b) constrictive
b.1. medial
b.2. lateral
The phonological relevance of the feature
is proved by the method of min pairs:
bake-make
Both classifications are effective + used
The position of the soft palate is also
taken into consideration. Acc to it
consonants:
Oral (p,t,v,s,r,l)
Nasal (m,n,η)
The feature is considered phonol-ly
irrelevant, cause there’re no 2 sounds in
English which differ only acc to this
feature. But it’s the 4
th
principle of clas-n of
cons-ts.
There’re 6 criteria for description + class-n
of vowels:
1) Stability of articul-n – 2 varieties:
a) The tongue position is stable, the
vowel is relatively
pure→monophthong
b) The tongue pos-n changes, the
vowel consists of 2 el-ts→dipgthong