Preface xv
selected by critics or assembled by organizations interested in promoting film.
None of these other lists, however, is based primarily on the votes of working
professionals in the motion picture industry, with representation of the cre-
ative talent in all of the crafts that contribute to filmmaking. These working
professionals understand and appreciate the art, the craft, and the business of
the movies better than anyone else, and this history of the Hollywood feature
film recognizes that fact.
This essential history of Hollywood is based on close attention to the
180 movies found on one or more of these three lists. Other movies may be
alluded to or mentioned, but this is a story told through the fewer than two
hundred films that the Academy and AFI have designated as having particular
significance.
Being about movies, this book is also largely about the people who make
movies: the creative impulses they feel, how they work, with whom they col-
laborate, and how they adapt to the complicated circumstances surrounding
the making of Hollywood movies. The other group of people who figure in
this history are the viewers who make up the audience for movies. Who it is
that makes up the audience—and when and how the audience changes—has
great influence on which movies are actually made and released.
At the same time, A History of American Movies is also about structures
and practices within the workings of the American cinema. For nearly five
decades, from the 1920s through the 1960s, movies were strongly identified
with the studios that produced them. During Hollywood’s Classic Era, nearly
any movie could be thought of as being from a particular studio—a typical
Warner Bros. production, for example, or a lavish film produced in charac-
teristic MGM style. Since the 1960s, movies have been increasingly identified
with the names of their individual directors. Either sort of identification may
be helpful, but it is never sufficient to account consistently for the imaginative
spark and dominant influence that resulted in a specific motion picture.
The question of who the dominating force is on any particular movie
must always be treated as an open one. A producer, a director, a screenwriter,
an actor, a director of photography, an editor, or even a production code
administrator, a production designer, or someone else working on the movie
or deciding on its distribution and exhibition may be the most important
single figure for that particular movie. There are theories that seek to ascribe
responsibility for the effectiveness of movies in general: for example, the auteur
theory, which asserts that the movie’s director is always the most dominant
figure in the making of a movie, or the Schreiber theory, which holds that the
most important figure is the writer of the screenplay on which any movie is
based. What is missed by these theories of attribution is that the cinema is
a collaborative art, and that the story of any particular movie is in how the