coordination, the ®rst are only weakly in¯uenced by these parameters. It can therefore be concluded
from Fig. 35 that the optical gap in A
4
C
60
and Na
10
C
60
is de®ned by an excitation to an adjacent C
60
molecule. The higher lying excitations, however, are intra-molecular transitions between different
electronic levels. Comparing the data in Fig. 34 to those of A
6
C
60
(Ref. [155] and Fig. 27), which
exhibit only one structure centered at about 1.1 eV arising from t
1u
! t
1g
transitions, it is clear that the
highly degenerate electronic levels of C
60
must be split in A
4
C
60
and Na
10
C
60
. The most likely
mechanism for such a splitting is a Jahn±Teller distortion of the molecules, which has been predicted to
be of the order of 0.2 eV for the t
1u
- and t
1g
-derived levels of a C
60
4
molecule [33±35] consistent with
the energy separation of the observed structures in Fig. 34. For Na
10
C
60
a similar Jahn±Teller splitting
can be assumed. This interpretation is supported by resonant Raman [182] and NMR [180] experiments
in which an (optically forbidden) excitation has been observed at around 0.2 eV for A
4
C
60
compounds
which can be attributed to transitions between the split t
1u
-derived states. Furthermore, optical studies
[155] have reported a splitting of the T
1u
(4) vibrational mode in A
4
C
60
and a signi®cant broadening of
the C1s excitation edges has been observed using EELS for A
4
C
60
[183] which is also fully consistent
with a Jahn±Teller distortion of the fullerene molecules.
The insulating ground state of A
4
C
60
and the observed behavior of the energy gap, however, cannot
be understood within a Jahn±Teller scenario. Firstly, the Jahn±Teller splitting of the molecular levels is
considerably smaller than the calculated one-particle bandwidth [177], from which one would therefore
expect the system to remain metallic. Secondly, the calculated bandwidths for f.c.c. and b.c.t. fulleride
systems are very similar [177,184]. It is thus impossible to rationalize the observed difference in the
magnitude of the gap between K
4
C
60
(b.c.t.) [66] and Na
4
C
60
(f.c.c.) [185] on the basis of a Jahn±Teller
model because the gap then would depend solely on the Jahn±Teller splitting and the bandwidths, both
of which hardly change. The energy shift of the gap as a function of V
p
indicates transitions to adjacent
molecules and one should therefore seriously consider electron correlation effects.
In the following it is shown that the size and the shift of the energy gap in the materials described
above can be satisfactorily explained within a simple Mott±Hubbard description [181]. The gap D in a
half-®lled correlated fulleride system roughly behaves as [186]:
D U
0
dU
N
p
W: (11)
The parameters are the bare on-site correlation energy U
0
2:9 eV [15], the screening of this energy
due to polarization dU 1:58 eV for a b.c.t. lattice with lattice constants a 11:886 A
Ê
and
c 10:774 A
Ê
and d U 1:69 eV for an f.c.c. lattice with a 14:1A
Ê
[181], the orbital degeneracy N of
the molecular t
1u
levels which form the conduction band N 3, and the conduction bandwidth W.For
systems with fourfold occupied t
1u
states
N
p
is reduced to
N
eff
p
1
2
2
p
3
p
.
The lattice dependence of D enters via those parameters which are a function of the nearest neighbor
distance d: dU / d
4
(Ref. [30]) and W / d
2
(Ref. [187]). Furthermore, band structure calculations
give a width of the t
1u
-derived bands of W 0:61 eV for K
3
C
60
(d 9:927 A
Ê
) [184], and 0.56 eV for
K
4
C
60
(d 9:969 A
Ê
) [177]. With the ®gures given above one obtains the gap as a function of d, D(d)
(d
0
9:969 A
Ê
):
DdU
0
dU
d
4
0
d
4
N
eff
p
W
d
2
0
d
2
: (12)
In Fig. 36, the d-dependence of D for crystals with b.c.t. A
4
C
60
; A K; Rb; Cs and f.c.c. symmetry
(Na
4
C
60
,Na
10
C
60
) is shown. Additionally depicted are the gap values as derived from the optical
38 M. Knupfer / Surface Science Reports 42 (2001) 1±74