Schilling rudders
With the advance of rotors and flaps the turning circle of vessels was able to be con-
siderably reduced. The introduction of the schilling rudder meant that a further
major reduction of the turning circle was achieved.
This particular design is a single-piece construction with no moving parts. It has a
hydrodynamic shape fitted with end plates, which help to extract slipstream rota-
tional energy. The trailing wedge reduces yaw to provide excellent course stability
according to the manufacturers.
When operational, the 70 to 75° helm position takes the full slipstream from the
propeller and diverts it at right angles to the hull, eliminating the need for stern
thrusters; an ideal property for berthing operations, giving a sideways movement to
the vessel.
The rudder design may be a fully hung spade, or a simplex type, with a balance of
about 40 per cent. Sizes of rudders vary, but the positioning should take account of
the recommended distance between the trailing edge of the propeller and the stern
of the vessel, to equal 1
1
/
2
times the propeller diameter.
Rudder movement is achieved by steering motors supplied by reputable manufac-
turers, although several fittings have employed rotary vane steering gear with
extremely responsive results; torque affecting the stock being similar to conventional
rudder designs.
Schilling VecTwin rudders
This system of twin Schilling rudders operated by rotary vane steering is expected
to provide improved course stability over and above a conventional rudder. From
the point of view of the ship handler, a single joystick control provides compara-
tively easy manoeuvring, the ship moving in the direction of the joystick movement;
the propulsive thrust being proportional to how far the stick is pushed from the
‘hover’ position.
Again there are no moving parts underwater, so providing reduced maintenance
and less wear and tear compared to conventional rudders. A further advantage is
that with the rudders in the clam shell position, the stopping distance of the vessel is
greatly reduced and the heading is still retained. The arrangement tends to work
well with bow thrust in opposition at the fore end, giving the vessel an extremely
tight turning circle practically within its own length.
If the turning circle of the vessel with a VecTwin rudder arrangement is considered,
the rapid speed reduction caused by the large rudder angles (65/70°) would expect
to result in a reduced angle of heel. Also, because the speed is reduced so are the
‘advance’ and ‘transfer’ values of the vessel in the turn. This subsequently provides
a tighter turning ability than, say, a conventional vessel.
APPENDIX C 203