276
Eemeren F. H. van, Grootendorst R. Speech Acts in
Argumentation Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the
Analysis of Discussions directed towards Solving Conflscts of
Opinion. — Dordrecht: Foris; Cinnaminson: PDA 1, 1984. (.
!% %: ! '. @. , >-
+. :S S S) -
). — : =, 1994.).
Eemeren F. H. van, Grootendorst R., Jackson S., Jacobs S.
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. — Tuscaloosa;
London: The University of Alabama Press. — 1993.
Eemeren, F. H. van, GrootendorstR., Snoeck Henkemans F. S.,
Blair J. A., Johnson R. H., Krabbe E. C. W., Plantin Ch., Walton
D. N., Willard Ch. A., Woods J., Zarefsky D. Fundamentals of
Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds
and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings. University
Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
Feteris E. T. Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation.: & Survey
of Theories on the Justification of Legal Decisions. — Dor-
drecht: Kluwer, 1999.
Fisher A. Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Freeley A.J. Agumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for
Reasoned Decisinion Making. — Belmont, CA: Wadswoth,
1993.
Freeman J.B. Dialectical Situations and Macrostructure of
Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure. — Berlin, New
Jork: Foris, 1991.
Gilbert M. Coalescent Argumentation. — Mahwah: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
Gilbert M. How to Win an Argument. — New York: MJF
Books, 2001.
Govier T. A. Practical Study of Argument (6th edition). —
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2006.
Govier T. The Philosophy of Argument. — Newport News: Vale
Press, 1999.
Govier T. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. —
Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter/Foris, 1997.
Groarke L., Tindale C. Good Reasoning Matters! (3rd
edition). — Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Hamblin C. L. Fallacies. — London: Methuen, 1970.
Johnson R. J. The Rise of Informal Logic. Newport News: Vale
Press, 1996.