PART IX Advanced Concepts
514
One approach to multiplexing is simplistically illustrated
for transmission by a one-dimensional ESA in Fig. 26. This
approach takes advantage of the fact that for any one look
angle,
θ
, the difference in the delays that successive feeds
must provide is the same from one end of the array of T/R-
modules to the other. In other words, the required delay for
feed (n + 1), differs from that for feed (n) by ∆T; the
required delay for feed (n + 2) differs from that for feed (n)
by 2 ∆T; the required delay for feed (n + 3), by 3 ∆T; and so
on.
In this example, to provide the differential delays the
feeds are grouped into four subarrays of four feeds each.
The input signal is modulated on carriers having four opti-
cal wavelengths: λ1, λ2, λ3, and λ4 and applied in parallel
to four BIFODELs, which delay it by 0, 1∆T, 2∆T, and 3∆T,
respectively.
The outputs of these BIFODELS are combined into a sin-
gle wavelength-multiplexed signal. It is applied in parallel
to four so-called “bias” BIFODELs, which provide the bal-
ance of the required delay for each subarray of feeds.
The signals output by each bias BIFODEL are wavelength
demultiplexed, detected, and supplied to the corresponding
subarray of T/R modules: the signal on carrier λ1, to the
first module in the subarray; the signal on carrier λ2, to the
second module in the subarray; and so on.
For negative values of
θ
—i. e., look angles to the right in
Fig. 27—the sizes of both the differential delays and the
bias delays are reversed: longest delay first, rather than last.
If the feeds are implemented entirely with optical com-
ponents, the same hardware can be used for both transmis-
sion and reception. But to receive, a laser must be provided
at each T/R module—adding, of course to its cost and com-
plexity, and impacting performance.
Even so, the net reduction in hardware complexity and
cost is substantial. With the multiplexing of many more fre-
quencies,
9
it can be dramatic.
Another advantage of wavelength multiplexing is that, by
adding a fixed increment (extension) to the length of each
of the bias delay lines, the majority of the optical compo-
nents may be mounted remotely from the antenna, thereby
simplifying the installation. Also, with remoting, higher
optical power can conveniently be provided by substituting
an external modulator fed by light from a CW laser source,
for each of the lower power directly modulated laser diodes
(Fig. 28). With an external modulator, very much higher rf
modulation frequencies may be used—up to 100 GHz, or
so. And, with higher optical power, rf input-to-output loss
can be reduced, and wider dynamic range and lower noise
figures can be achieved.
9. Up to 150 carriers having full
18 GHz bandwidths can be
provided. The limiting factor:
coupling of adjacent optical
wavelengths.
λ4
Differentially
Delayed
Duplicates of
Input Signal
Bias
Delays Of
Multiplexed
Duplicates
Demultiplexed
Progressively Less
Delayed Duplicates of
Input Signal
RF Input Signal
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
θ
26.
One approach to wavelength multiplexing. Each of the three
differential delays is produced by a separate BIFODEL, as is
each of the three bias delays. By adding a fixed length to each
bias delay line, the bulk of the hardware may be mounted
remotely.
Multiplexed
Differentially
Delayed Duplicates
of Input Signal
Bias
Delays
Demultiplexed
Progressively More
Delayed Duplicates of
Input Signal
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
RF Input Signal
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
λ1
λ2
λ3
λ4
θ
27. Delays applied to steer the antenna’s beam θ° to the right
instead of the left. Delays are the same as shown in Fig. 26,
but their order is reversed.
v
in
CW
Laser
Driver/
Amplifier
External
Modulator
Low-Level rf
P
out
P
in
v
in
P
out
Optical Fiber
RF Circuit
Transfer function
28.
External modulator provides higher optical power than a photo
diode; yields wider dynamic range, lower noise figure, and
reduced RF input-to-output loss. But, is best employed remotely.