Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008
Education and learning 743
Around the time of the death of Boethius, in Italy there were two others
who retreated from the world. Each one is significant for the future of culture,
particularly monastic culture. As early as 496,Benedict of Nursia retreated to
Subiaco, and in 537 Cassiodorus retreated to Vivarium. Having come to Rome
to pursue his studies, Benedict abandoned them in order to seek God in the
‘desert’: ‘Seeing many men run to the precipices of vices, he drew back, as it
were, the foot which he had stretched forward to enter the world, fearing that,
if he so much as brushed against the knowledge of this world, he himself would
lose himself in this monstrous gulf.’
25
Beneath the rhetoric of this narration,
the idea is clear: profane studies of the traditional type seemed to Benedict
unsuitable for satisfying his aspiration to the perfect life, and he abandoned
them without regret for hermetic, and then coenobitic, asceticism.
Starting with the disciples of Jerome in the fourth century, the life of the
Christian ascetics was based entirely around intelligence and the prayerful med-
itation of the Bible, in readings which were sometimes collective, sometimes
personal: in liturgical celebrations and in the solitude of the lectio divina.
26
It
was therefore logical that the Rule, drawn up by Benedict for his monks at
Monte Cassino in the middle of the sixth century, gave a primordial place to
this reading in the monastic timetable: that is, collective reading in the eight
offices of the opus divinum which put rhythm into the daily prayer of the com-
munity. But he also stipulated private reading throughout all the time reserved
for the monk’s individual activities. The last chapter of the Rule enumerates
the authors whom Benedict put on the reading list: not only the Old and New
Testaments but ‘the works of the Holy Catholic Fathers’ (or patristic litera-
ture, as we would say), ‘the Conferences of the Fathers, their Institutions’ (i.e.
probably the two major works of John Cassian), ‘and their Lives’ (doubtless
the Lives of the Fathers of the desert), and finally ‘the Rule of our Father St
Basil’ (certainly in one of its Latin translations).
27
Curiously, the Rule of Benedict made no reference to any school or to
any elementary intellectual training; but amongst the monks’ equipment it
25
Gregory the Great, Dialogues 2,prologue: ‘Sed cum in eis multos ire per abrupta vitiorum cerneret,
eum, quem quasi in ingressum mundi posuerat, retraxit pedem, ne, si quid de scientia eius adtingeret,
ipse quoque postmodum in inmane praecipitium totus iret.’
26
On the lectio divina, see Dictionnaire de spiritualit
´
e,Paris (1976), ix, cols. 470–87. The exercise was
described as early as the third century in a famous text by Cyprian, Epist. i.15:‘Sit tibi vel oratio
adsidua vel lectio: nunc cum Deo loquere, nunc Deus tecum.’ It held a very important place in the
monk’s activities: Regula Benedicti 48, ed. de Vog
¨
u
´
e(1977), vii,pp.338–49 for commentary.
27
Reg. Ben. 73, 3s.: ‘sermo divinae auctoritatis Veteris ac Novi Testamenti . . . liber sanctorum catholico-
rumPatrum . . . Collationes Patrum et Instituta et Vitas eorum, sed et Regula sancti Patris nostri
Basilii’. All this made up the doctrinae sanctorum Patrum:tobeunderstood, according to de Vog
¨
u
´
e,
La R
`
egle iv,p.110,inthe sense of ‘the whole of the writings of the Fathers, ecclesiastical as well as
monastic’.