COURT DRESS In the increasingly informal society
of the early 2000s, in which many social barriers have
broken down, it is arresting to read of the rigid code of
manners that once determined who was, and who was
not, eligible to be received at court, and who was, or was
not, therefore part of “Good Society.” In Europe, by the
seventeenth century, wearing the correct dress on this
occasion was quite as important as having the right back-
ground.
Within a royal household, officers were appointed
to supervise aspects of royal life. The officer, often called
a lord chamberlain, who had charge of public and cere-
monial events, would usually oversee the regulation of
dress and matters of etiquette. By the nineteenth century,
as the categories of people eligible for court presentation
increased, and the styles of court dress became ever more
various and complex, all earlier printed dress instructions
were drawn together and published as formal regulations.
In Great Britain, “Dress Worn at Court,” first published
in 1882, was updated and reissued at about five-yearly in-
tervals until 1937. Subsequently, hand-lists have been
provided to specific individuals within the Royal House-
hold, Foreign Office, Parliament, and Law Courts where
the wearing of court dress may survive.
Until the late eighteenth century, in many European
countries, many offices and titles remained as the per-
sonal gift of the monarch and members of his family.
Both politicians and merchants found it essential to
demonstrate to potential supporters that they enjoyed the
favor of the court, to see their projects succeed. Even as
the political importance of the court began to wane, there
was always social advantage to be gained and special ef-
forts continued to be made within the royal household
to regulate the numbers and social standing of those at-
tending. It was necessary for any new aspiring attendee
to locate someone who had already been presented, to
serve as his or her sponsor. In seventeenth-century
France, a set of rules called “les honneurs de la cour”
were drawn up. A French lady craving admittance had to
prove a title of nobility extending back to 1400. Since the
eighteenth century, there is evidence that this system
could be abused: court officials could be bribed to gain
admittance, the services of a sponsor could be bought,
and sometimes the monarch himself would override the
rules allowing a person of humble birth to attend as “une
faveur de choix.”
The Spanish court was the earliest to actively pro-
mote a distinctive court dress from the sixteenth century.
All courtiers, state officials, and those attending court had
to wear a doublet and close-fitting knee breeches, made
of silk or wool in a somber color, worn with the stiff “go-
rilla” collar of white linen. Eventually, the practice was
adopted throughout the Spanish Empire, in Austria, and
certain Catholic German states.
By the mid-seventeenth century, Louis XIV was con-
cerned with promoting himself, the prestige of the
French court, French fashion, and culture. In 1661 he
devised a system whereby fifty of his closest friends and
supporters were allocated by special warrant a specific
court dress. It was composed of a blue coat called a “jus-
taucorps a brevet,” lined with red and trimmed with gold
and silver galloon (braided trimming with scalloped
edges), to a degree not allowed within earlier sumptuary
legislation. The outfit was completed with a waistcoat,
knee breeches, red-heeled shoes, and a sword. When the
dauphin reached his majority, a brown coat similarly em-
bellished was devised as the regulation dress for his
household.
In about 1670, Louis XIV, perhaps with his brother,
Philippe, duc d’Orleans and his wife, established the
“grand habit” as a court dress for women. This dress had
a stiff-boned bodice with a low, round neckline and cap
sleeves trimmed with tiers of ruffles called “engageantes.”
The skirt was cut full, and pulled back to reveal the pet-
ticoat worn beneath. This was often richly decorated. For
their first presentation to the French king the “grand
habit” had to be black. Subsequently, colored dresses
could be worn. By about 1730 the petticoat was worn
supported on large side hoops. A train replaced the skirt.
French court dress was adopted with small variations
as court dress throughout Europe. By 1700 it had even
become the regulation dress at the Spanish court for all
but the most formal occasions.
In Great Britain the “grand habit” or “stiff bodied
gown” was worn by members of the royal family and their
immediate circle for royal weddings and coronations.
However, by about 1700, the mantua was the customary
dress worn by ladies attending court. It had an unboned
bodice and full skirt. The neckline was cut square, and
the bodice was closed in front with a separate stomacher.
The elbow-length sleeves were finished with tiers of ruf-
fles. The skirt was lifted back to reveal a petticoat worn
beneath and by about 1750 served as little more than a
train. By 1730 the petticoat was supported with large side
hoops.
Ladies attending court in 1750 were generally wear-
ing ostrich feathers as a hair ornament, and in 1762 Ho-
race Walpole notes that they were considered “de
rigueur.” Lace lappets had also emerged as the enduring
trimming.
Men’s court dress in Great Britain was also simpler
than its French counterpart, comprising a coat, waistcoat,
and knee breeches, often made of fine silks and velvet,
and frequently lavishly embellished with embroidery.
The “grand habit” saw its demise in 1789 with the
French Revolution. However, by 1804 a new official dress
had been devised by Jean-Baptiste Isabey for French gov-
ernment officials, as well as Napoleon, his family, and in-
ner circle. For ladies a court train alone was retained,
worn over fashionable evening dress.
COURT DRESS
312
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CLOTHING AND FASHION
69134-ECF-C_211-332.qxd 8/16/2004 2:30 PM Page 312