Hafnium is rarely of significance in exploration programmes, and so the data can
usually be disregarded or given low emphasis. If unusual levels do occur (e.g., in
association with elevated levels of the geochemically associated element Zr) it may be
that there is some dust contamination of samples.
Halogens (F, Br, Cl and I)
Discussed in detail on CD.
The halogen elements (F, Cl, Br, I) are commonly associated with the emplace-
ment of mineral deposits. They are contained within the structure of many minerals
and in saline fluid inclusions that are typical of a wide range of mineral deposits.
Their volatility renders them good candidates to examine as ‘pathfinder elements’ in
surface geochemical media where they may be captured on soil particles and taken up
by vegetation. Russian workers (e.g., Trofimov and Rychkov, 2004) have demon-
strated the exceptional migrational abilities of I and Br in different geological set-
tings, and found these elements to be highly effective in exploring for ore bodies at
depths of up to 1000 m.
Halogens that might be derived from concealed mineralization are likely to be
primarily the labile (readily leached) portions that may have emanated from a min-
eral deposit, and not the halogens structurally bound in crystal lattices (e.g., in
apatite, micas and other rock-forming elements). A study designed to determine the
optimal analytical procedures concluded that for Br, Cl and I a warm wat er digestion
of milled vegetation, with instrumental finish by high-resolut ion ICP-MS was the
preferred method, with F analysis on the same solution by ion selective electrode
(Dunn et al., 2006a, b). By these methods, detection limits are, in ppm, Br (1), Cl
(0.2), I (0.001) and F (0.4). These levels are adequate for most vegetation samples to
yield values above detection.
The study showed that, from a water leach the halogens exhibit a clear response
to most zones of Au and Cu mineralization that were tested. Depths to mineral-
ization varied from a thin veneer to possibly tens of metres of Quaternary and/or
volcanic cover. Halogen signatures varied according to the nature of the mineral-
ization: whereas I may provide the best signature in one area, F may be best in
another. This indicates that each style of mineralization is likely to generate a dif-
ferent suite of positive halogen responses that have yet to be clearly defined; hence
analysis for all four halogens is advisable. Pine bark is the vegetation medium that
best concentrates I, and gives good contrast for the other halogens. The full report on
this study was presented to the British Columbia research organization ‘Geoscience
BC’ in 2006 (Dunn et al., 2006b), and is reproduced in full on the CD that accom-
panies this book. Included are full data listings on soils and several types of veg-
etation for which a 53-el ement ICP-MS package was obtained, as well as the weak
leaches for the halogens.
258
Biogeochemical Behaviour of the Elements