The Difco Manual 549
1. To prepare 100 ml of final medium, sterilize 90 ml of distilled or
deionized water at 121-124°C for 15 minutes.
2. Cool to 50-55°C. Aseptically add 10 ml of Urea Broth Concentrate.
Mix thoroughly.
3. Distribute 3 ml amounts into sterile test tubes (14 x 125 mm).
Specimen Collection and Preparation
Refer to appropriate references for specimen collection and preparation.
Test Procedure
Urea Agar
1. Use a heavy inoculum of growth from a pure 18-24 hour culture.
Inoculate by streaking back and forth over the entire slant surface.
Do not stab the butt because it serves as a color control.
2. Incubate tubes with loosened caps at 35 ± 2°C.
3. Observe reactions after 6 and 24 hours and every day thereafter for
a total of 6 days.
1
Longer periods of incubation may be necessary.
Urea Broth
1. Inoculate with a heavy inoculum, using a straight needle or a drop
from an 18-24 hour culture. Shake tube gently to resuspend the
bacteria.
2. Incubate aerobically at 35 ± 2°C.
3. Record reactions after 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours of incubation.
Results
Urea Agar
Positive: The production of urease is indicated by an intense red or
cerise color on the slant which may penetrate into the butt.
Negative: No color change of the medium.
Urea Broth
Positive: The production of urease is indicated by an intense red or
cerise color throughout the broth.
Negative: No color change of the broth.
Limitations of the Procedure
Urea Agar Base
1. The alkaline reaction produced in this medium after prolonged
incubation may not be caused by urease activity. False positive
reactions may occur due to the utilization of peptones (especially
in slant agar by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, for example) or other
proteins which raise the pH due to protein hydrolysis and the
release of excessive amino acid residues. To eliminate possible
protein hydrolysis, perform a control test with the same test
medium without urea.
17
2. Do not heat or reheat the medium because urea decomposes
very easily.
3. Urea Agar detects rapid urease activity of only the urease-positive
Proteus species. For results to be valid for the detection of Proteus,
the results must be read within the first 2 to 6 hours after incubation.
Urease-positive Enterobacter, Citrobacter or Klebsiella, in contrast,
hydrolyze urea much more slowly, showing only slight penetration
of the alkaline reaction into the butt of the medium in 6 hours and
requiring 3 to 5 days to change the reaction of the entire butt.
Urea Broth
1. To rule out false positives due to protein hydrolysis (as opposed to
urea hydrolysis) that may occur in the medium after prolonged
incubation, perform a control test with the same test medium
without urea.
17
2. Do not heat or reheat the medium because urea decomposes
very easily.
3. The high buffering system in this medium masks urease activity in
organisms that are delayed positive. This medium is therefore
recommended for the detection of urease activity in all Proteus
spp., Providencia rettgeri and urease- positive Providencia
stuartii.
1
M. morganii slowly hydrolyzes urea and may require
approximately a 36 hour incubation for a strong urease-positive
reaction to occur.
1
If in doubt as to a result, compare with an
uninoculated tube or incubate for an additional 24 hours.
4. Variations in the size of the inoculum can affect the time required
to reach positive (alkaline, pH 8.1) results. The accepted standard
inoculum is 0.1 ml.
1
References
1. Christensen, W. B. 1946. Urea decomposition as a means of
differentiating Proteus and paracolon cultures from each other and
from Salmonella and Shigella types. J. Bacteriol. 52:461.
2. Ewing, W. H. 1946. An additional Shigella paradysenteriae
serotype. J. Bacteriol. 51:433-445.
3. Ewing, W. H., and D. W. Bruner. 1947. Selection of Salmonella
and Shigella cultures for serologic classification. Am. J. Clin.
Path. 17:1-12.
4. Qadri, S. M. Hussain, S. Zubairi, H. P. Hawley, and E. G.
Ramirez. 1984. Simple spot test for rapid detection of urease
activity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20(6):1198-1199.
5. Baron, E. J., L. R. Peterson, and S. M. Finegold. 1994. Bailey &
Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology, 9th edition. Mosby-Year Book,
Inc., St. Louis, MO.
6. Kent, P. T., and G. P. Kubica. 1985. Public health
mycobacteriology - A guide for the level III laboratory. U.S.
Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA.
7. Stuart, C. A., E. Van Stratum, and R. Rustigian. 1945. Further
studies on urease production by Proteus and related organisms.
J. Bacteriol. 49:437.
8. Rustigian, R., and C. A. Stuart. 1941. Decomposition of urea by
Proteus. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 47:108-112.
9. Ferguson, W. W., and A. E. Hook. 1943. Urease activity
of Proteus and Salmonella organisms. J. Lab. Clin. Med.
28:1715-1719.
10. Vanderzant, C., and D. F. Splittstoesser. 1992. Compendium of
methods for the microbiological examination of foods, 3rd ed.
American Public Health Assoc., Washington, D.C.
11. Marshall, R. T. (ed.) 1993. Standard methods for the examination
of dairy products, 16th ed. American Public Health Assoc.,
Washington, D.C.
12. Holt, J. G., N. R. Krieg, P. H. A. Sneath, J. T. Staley, and S. T.
Williams. 1994. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology,
9th edition. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
Section II Urea Agar Base, Urea Agar Base Concentrate, Urea Broth & Urea Broth Concentrate