In 1967, the burgeoning discontent of many political scientists
culminated in the establishment of the Caucus for a New Political
Science. The Caucus included political scientists of many diverse
viewpoints, but it was united methodologically by a critique of
behavioralism and by the idea that political science should abandon
the myth of a value-free science. In recent years, political
scientists have authored numerous commentaries on the trajedy of
political science, the crisis in political science, and the flight
from reality in political science, while in 2000 these discontents
resurfaced in the perestroika rebellion, which again denounced the
APSA as an organization that promotes a narrow parochialism and
methodological bias toward the quantitative, behavioral, rational
choice, statistical, and formal modeling approaches. This paper
reviews the intellectual origins of New Political Science by
examing some of the major works of the late 1960s and early 1970s
purporting to establish the foundations of a new political science.
It concludes that new political science offers a methodological
critique of behaviorialism and a sociological critique of the
relationship between political science and political power, but
there is no consensus on what constitutes a new political science
beyond its critical stance toward the existing discipline.